CSS Front-end Frameworks Comparison

This site has been shown here several times over the last few year(s), and it still looks pretty useless. No UI improvements, no Stylus frameworks, no framework size or mention of stuff like CSS resets.<p>It&#x27;s pretty useless considering the fact that most of all frameworks already will work with the modern browsers, and thus why would anyone begin their selection based off of browser compatibility? I will say that knowing whether it&#x27;s open source, and whether it&#x27;s responsive-ready is nice.<p>At the very least a preview picture for each framework&#x27;s common elements would make this kind site useful.

Being able to filter by browser requirements would be useful, i.e. I need IE8+, what can I use?<p>edit: here&#x27;s a filter for IE8+<p><pre><code> jQuery(&quot;.parent&quot;).filter(function(){ return $(&#x27;.ie&#x27;, this).data(&quot;version&quot;) &gt; 8 }).hide()</code></pre>

Shameless plug, but we&#x27;ve been working on a very mobile focused framework and UI library called Ionic which some people might find interesting (also uses AngularJS): <a href="http://ionicframework.com/new/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ionicframework.com&#x2F;new&#x2F;</a>

It&#x27;s missing multiple frameworks. I didn&#x27;t see <a href="http://gumbyframework.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;gumbyframework.com</a> or <a href="http://semantic-ui.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;semantic-ui.com</a>.

I would like to see the total size of each framework in this list as well, it would be beneficial when comparing front end frameworks.

I&#x27;m missing Pure (<a href="http://purecss.io/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;purecss.io&#x2F;</a>) in this list. Was it excluded because of the lack of directly included JS?

would be nice to see <a href="http://susy.oddbird.net/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;susy.oddbird.net&#x2F;</a> and <a href="http://topcoat.io/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;topcoat.io&#x2F;</a> as well