TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Show HN: Beautiful and Ridiculously Fast Websites With Static Blogging

28 点作者 calebhicks超过 11 年前

7 条评论

calebhicks超过 11 年前
A group of us got together and put this together.<p>We decided that Wordpress sucked for us. Then we stepped into static blogging with Pelican. Then we realized that static blogging kinda sucks too. Setting it up and the dearth of themes are rough.<p>Can you give us some feedback? We&#x27;re still working on this together, and would love to hear what you guys think.
评论 #6788542 未加载
评论 #6788287 未加载
gexla超过 11 年前
I was looking for something like this the other day and found a mine-field of services which seemed like they never went anywhere. Sometimes I would like to be able to throw up a site where I can create content using something like Editorially, have automatically backed up and not have to mess with everything else involved in running a site and making sure content is backed up.<p>I was looking for something which could run Markdown files from Dropbox (and pick the folder from which they are pulled.) I would also like to be able to make posts (or even the entire site) private if needed (publishing workflow.)
joshbaptiste超过 11 年前
<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6787317" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=6787317</a>
评论 #6788309 未加载
ricardobeat超过 11 年前
That logo is taken <a href="http://dcurt.is/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;dcurt.is&#x2F;</a>
评论 #6788452 未加载
beambot超过 11 年前
So... kinda like a cross between WooThemes and jekyll (or hyde)? Seems like a pretty good idea -- especially for a large subset of business websites where &lt;favorite CMS&gt; is overkill.
评论 #6788240 未加载
livestyle超过 11 年前
Interested in your strategy for ecommerce sites. I wonder if foxycart integration would make sense.
waps超过 11 年前
I don&#x27;t get this. As fast as static blogging is, in-memory applications:<p>1) will actually beat static files in speed<p>2) you lose none of the flexibility of databases. In fact, because your effective query impact is going to be much smaller, you gain. Not in what can theoretically be done, but in what can be done practically without impact on response time, you gain a lot. Also expressivity gains (SQL is good, but it doesn&#x27;t match general programming languages) (e.g. drawing a graph of &quot;this person replies to this person and never replies to this other person&quot; would be feasible).<p>I suppose there&#x27;s problems too:<p>3) you lose that your state is always on-disk. In other words : there&#x27;s a chance that you&#x2F;your developer will get it wrong, but you won&#x27;t notice it until your process restarts, which can be months.<p>4) of course, you have to start monitoring memory usage in these kinds of scenarios.
评论 #6788529 未加载
评论 #6788639 未加载
评论 #6788545 未加载