TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Salesforce’s Hackathon Scandal: Secret Judging, Favoritism, Cheating?

108 点作者 jefflinwood超过 11 年前

9 条评论

bronbron超过 11 年前
Hackathons in general should be viewed with a serious amount of skepticism because it mostly is, as Liu notes, a way to get you to work for a company for (basically) free.<p>That being said, this sounds above-and-beyond scummy based on the information provided. The lack of transparency and the fact that the grand-prize winner worked at Salesforce for 9 years is a seriously questionable combination.<p>Aside from apologizing profusely, though, I don&#x27;t know what Salesforce does here. It&#x27;d be pretty mean to yank the guy&#x27;s prize (and would only lend credence to the conspiracy argument), but doing nothing or promising to &quot;do better in the future&quot; will certainly be a PR hit for Salesforce both in terms of recruiting and future activities sponsored by them.<p>They&#x27;re in a tough spot, though I don&#x27;t really pity them since it was their own doing.
评论 #6803036 未加载
评论 #6803048 未加载
评论 #6804109 未加载
评论 #6803029 未加载
评论 #6803351 未加载
chasing超过 11 年前
&gt; &quot;They set expectations that they were looking for serious apps, serious work, serious time,” [Seth Piezas] says.<p>That&#x27;s wonderful! As a serious developer, you have a serious rate you offer your serious services at.<p>(Also: Do I read right? They own the code? To paraphrase Obi-Wan Kenobi: &quot;That&#x27;s no hackathon.&quot;)
raganwald超过 11 年前
Outrageous, but consistent with a world where most sales are made by gaming procurement processes.
评论 #6803297 未加载
评论 #6803407 未加载
VladRussian2超过 11 年前
young naive hackers and BigCo&#x27;s &quot;developers, developers, developers&quot; marketing management drones. Call it a hackathon and they&#x27;ll come.<p>I may be too old, yet i just don&#x27;t get how exciting is the app that builds an itineary for visiting most valuable clients or any other CRM app. Until of course 1M is thrown into the pot. And of course excitement disappears again once 1M happens to not even make it to the pot. :)<p>btw, closing shop at 6pm isn&#x27;t a sign of conspiracy - it was already an hour past 5pm as in &quot;9 to 5&quot; :) Talking about canyon deep gap between different mentalities ...
avalaunch超过 11 年前
Just to play devil&#x27;s advocate, wouldn&#x27;t it make sense that members of the winning team had previously worked for Salesforce? They would have a big advantage of knowing the sort of apps Salesforce were looking for. I suppose the best counter to this would be if Salesforce disallowed previous employees from entering at all.<p>Also, I&#x27;m still confused at what does and doesn&#x27;t constitute pre-existing code at hackathons. It&#x27;s such a grey area. I think Salesforce definitely should have done a better job of addressing this before the hackathon began. As it was, it&#x27;s no surprise that some teams interpreted the rule differently than others and those teams that interpreted it most loosely held the advantage.
评论 #6803311 未加载
评论 #6803572 未加载
评论 #6803438 未加载
rickrozay超过 11 年前
It sounds like they were working on it much longer than 4 weeks: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4844318" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=4844318</a>
danso超过 11 年前
If these allegations are true...I don&#x27;t know what&#x27;s worse. The actual alleged wrongdoing, or how ineptly it was conducted. Business-minded people may be meh about whether hackathons are good...but a CRM company that can&#x27;t even conduct he basic functions for a coverup (I.e. Create a themed bootstrap page that simply lists all entrants)...if they can&#x27;t do CRM when it&#x27;s absolutely necessary to protect their own asses, it doesn&#x27;t speak we&#x27;ll for how they perform CRM for their clients
评论 #6803313 未加载
Xeroday超过 11 年前
The problem is that the judges didn&#x27;t have time to do a background check on all the submissions. After all, UPSHOT only came under scrutiny after they had already won.
评论 #6803456 未加载
justinelof超过 11 年前
I mean, of course there was cheating and favoritism... lol, kqed.