TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Crime Lab Scandal Leaves Massachusetts Legal System In Turmoil

174 点作者 darkmethod超过 11 年前

17 条评论

chimeracoder超过 11 年前
&gt; &quot;It&#x27;s unsettling and maddening, because you&#x27;re now going to have a lot of people get released to the street prematurely,&quot; says Middlesex County District attorney Gerry Leone, one of many hoping the state supreme court will curb the releases.<p>That&#x27;s a pretty bad way of looking at this, because it assumes that those people <i>deserved</i> to be behind bars to begin with, and ignores those that didn&#x27;t.<p>How about, &quot;It&#x27;s unsettling and maddening, because we now realize we have a lot of people behind bars without the [proper] due process they deserved&quot;?
评论 #6831798 未加载
评论 #6831454 未加载
评论 #6830828 未加载
评论 #6831433 未加载
评论 #6832227 未加载
judk超过 11 年前
<a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2012/12/20/indicted-drug-analyst-annie-dookhan-mails-reveal-her-close-personal-ties-prosecutors/A37GaatHLKfW1kphDjxLXJ/story.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.boston.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;local&#x2F;massachusetts&#x2F;2012&#x2F;12&#x2F;20&#x2F;in...</a><p>The DA is already covering up and defending the prosecutor&#x27;s involvement, saying there is nothing wrong with prosecutors telling Dhookan what test results they needed to get their convictions, in clear violation of proper experimental procedures.
评论 #6831556 未加载
评论 #6832156 未加载
评论 #6833769 未加载
danso超过 11 年前
The OP is a bit outdated...Dookhan has since been sentenced to 3 to 5 years in prison:<p><a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/11/22/annie-dookhan-former-state-chemist-who-mishandled-drug-evidence-agrees-plead-guilty/7UU3hfZUof4DFJGoNUfXGO/story.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bostonglobe.com&#x2F;metro&#x2F;2013&#x2F;11&#x2F;22&#x2F;annie-dookhan-fo...</a><p>The system is indeed in turmoil as it has to continue to review a massive number of cases. One of the worser case scenarios has since happened: a man who was freed because of possibly tainted evidence went on to allegedly murder someone<p><a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/05/17/man-freed-because-annie-dookhan-case-charged-brockton-murder/8bWlbdDMmRef2l6yW2KVEL/story.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bostonglobe.com&#x2F;metro&#x2F;2013&#x2F;05&#x2F;17&#x2F;man-freed-becaus...</a>
评论 #6830247 未加载
tokenadult超过 11 年前
Minnesota Public Radio reported often about systemic problems in the St. Paul, Minnesota crime lab over the last few years.<p><a href="http://blogs.mprnews.org/cities/2013/08/st-paul-police-crime-lab-back-up-and-running-after-scandal/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;blogs.mprnews.org&#x2F;cities&#x2F;2013&#x2F;08&#x2F;st-paul-police-crime...</a><p>It seems those problems are now mostly cleaned up, and there is no particular implication here that a similar problem exists in the state crime lab, but it is a very good idea for citizens to press law enforcement administrators to make sure that crime lab procedures are validated and standardized and checked and rechecked.<p>When I started reading the skeptical literature a decade or so ago, I was astonished to discover that even fingerprint identification is not a well standardized or well validated procedure. And I used to believe that defense attorneys (I am a lawyer by training, although I don&#x27;t practice law) were mostly willfully ignorant of science when they cast doubt on DNA evidence. But now I heartily approve the side-effect of our adversary system of justice, which when it works best should have the &quot;other side&quot; questioning every form of evidence and putting it to the test of rigorous validation. I think too often people trying to solve the problem of crime through the criminal justice system look for quick answers rather than exact answers.<p>AFTER EDIT: This background article link<p><a href="http://badchemistry.wbur.org/2013/05/19/annie-dookhan-and-the-massachusetts-drug-lab-crisis" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;badchemistry.wbur.org&#x2F;2013&#x2F;05&#x2F;19&#x2F;annie-dookhan-and-th...</a><p>from the NPR affiliate in Boston updates the story and is more current than the NPR link kindly submitted here (which is from March 2013 rather than May 2013).
评论 #6831583 未加载
评论 #6832380 未加载
theg2超过 11 年前
All sorts of &quot;fun&quot; stuff going on here:<p>Another chemist found with no credentials - <a href="http://badchemistry.wbur.org/2013/11/26/mass-chemist-academic-credentials" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;badchemistry.wbur.org&#x2F;2013&#x2F;11&#x2F;26&#x2F;mass-chemist-academi...</a><p>How fast did Dookhan work contrasted to case load: <a href="http://badchemistry.wbur.org/2013/05/15/annie-dookhan-drug-testing-productivity" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;badchemistry.wbur.org&#x2F;2013&#x2F;05&#x2F;15&#x2F;annie-dookhan-drug-t...</a>
malandrew超过 11 年前
I would love to see every single email by DAs that include her name subpoenaed.<p><pre><code> &quot;The report shows that the Hinton lab leaned heavily on Dookhan’s productivity. Supervisors lauded her work ethic and assigned her an increasing share of tests.&quot;[0] </code></pre> We should know what her supervisors and DA were saying in private about her work to her and to one another. There is no way that someone is so much more productive, without anyone ever suspecting wrongdoing and turning a blind eye to all this. Anyone who had ever expressed suspicion of her work, but never raised the issue should be liable for criminal negligence here.<p>[0] <a href="http://badchemistry.wbur.org/2013/05/15/annie-dookhan-drug-testing-productivity" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;badchemistry.wbur.org&#x2F;2013&#x2F;05&#x2F;15&#x2F;annie-dookhan-drug-t...</a>
评论 #6832386 未加载
malandrew超过 11 年前
In one of the threads about this scandal someone said that it would be valuable to send known negative samples to a lab and check which ones come back positive, so that we can investigate whether misconduct was involved. This is basically equivalent to unit testing, since they are known assert(false) tests. Unit tests can be devised to test crime labs, district attorneys, law enforcement officers, judges, etc.<p>This makes me think if maybe this wouldn&#x27;t be a worthwhile test for the justice system in general. Hire actors to pose as criminals in the system where the person is not guilty, but where most evidence supports a guilty verdict with a few smaller pieces of evidence that prove innocent. With this we find out how many prosecutors take the case all the way to conviction by willingly choosing to ignore evidence suggesting guilt and which decide to drop the case because they believe the person to be innocent. This would be the equivalent of acceptance testing the justice system.
评论 #6833007 未加载
评论 #6833733 未加载
vsviridov超过 11 年前
34000 tainted cases is not &quot;messed up big time&quot;. It&#x27;s deliberate and malicious. And she gets 3-5 years? Bullshit.
评论 #6830512 未加载
评论 #6830296 未加载
评论 #6830092 未加载
评论 #6830075 未加载
评论 #6830314 未加载
gms超过 11 年前
I assume nothing will happen to the prosecutors she worked with.
评论 #6831321 未加载
tjaerv超过 11 年前
Previously: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI_Laboratory#Controversy" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;FBI_Laboratory#Controversy</a>
chris_wot超过 11 年前
According to Dookhan&#x27;s lawyer, she says that she did it because she wanted to get a 8 hour pay-check, that there was &quot;too much red tape&quot; but very loose protocol.<p>But - she&#x27;s <i>not</i> a rogue chemist! Oh no.<p>When chemists do lab tests, are they blind to the criminal circumstances themselves?<p><a href="http://www.wbur.org/2013/11/29/dookhan-lawyer" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wbur.org&#x2F;2013&#x2F;11&#x2F;29&#x2F;dookhan-lawyer</a><p>What I find really awful, is that in many cases, jobs were lost, families destroyed, and sentences were stiffer because of false results by this chemist.
dyscrete超过 11 年前
Could she have been manipulated by prosecutors? Yes she should be held accountable for her actions, but I have a hunch that prosecutors had something more to do with this.
michaelfeathers超过 11 年前
I&#x27;m curious what percentage of testing goes through that lab.
评论 #6830051 未加载
评论 #6830054 未加载
w_t_payne超过 11 年前
I am shocked and horrified that a loyal servant of the system should be discarded so casually. After all, falsifying convictions is just a part of how the system works, isn&#x27;t it?<p>You have to keep the lower orders scared to keep them loyal - otherwise they might start getting ideas above their station, mightn&#x27;t they? It&#x27;s like holding a wolf by the ears: release it, and we would all be in trouble.
Yeah_Sure超过 11 年前
Story looked familiar. This is back in March.
laveur超过 11 年前
Being a Mass. Resident this is really really really really old news! How the hell is this just not getting here?
yeukhon超过 11 年前
what is her motive?
评论 #6830057 未加载
评论 #6830291 未加载
评论 #6830078 未加载