Dell Leaks Details of a 24” UHD 4K (3840x2160) Monitor

Watch out for problems with the monitor. New ultra-high-def monitors often have problems such as lag or poor color accuracy.<p>Before buying this, you need to wait until a professional with a colorimeter and a lagmeter evaluates this monitor if you remotely care about color accuracy or gaming. Resolution isn&#x27;t the only consideration when buying a new monitor.

With the 39&quot; Seiki 4K &quot;tv&quot; at less than $500 shipped, the $3,500 pricing level on the Dells seems excessive. I&#x27;m certain the Dells are better monitors, but are they 700% better? If Seiki revs their model line-up to include display-port, all these official monitors will really be in trouble.<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00DOPGO2G" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;dp&#x2F;B00DOPGO2G</a>

I really wish companies would stop selling monitors with their logo placed obnoxiously on the front. I don&#x27;t care if they put the logo on any other part of the display, but why do they have to ruin the front of it? I really love looking at plain black slabs, with nothing to distract me from the content within.<p>I want to buy a couple of monitors and mount them. But there&#x27;s just one small thing stopping me. I don&#x27;t know if it&#x27;s just me, but something <i>feels</i> wrong about rotating a monitor with such a prominent logo.

I have recently gotten a taste of ultra high resolution monitors.<p>My coworker got the new Dell XPS 15, which has a QHD+ 3200x1800 screen. Just a heads up to coders, unless you plan to hunch your back or get new glasses, very few of you will enjoy the screen as much as you think you would.

3840 x 2160 in 24 inches = 183.58 pixels per inch, compared to 204 for the IBM T220&#x2F;T221<p>We&#x27;re almost back to 10 years ago, yay.

I&#x27;m left wondering how long until we have mainstream video cards capable of driving games at these resolutions? Seems like we&#x27;re a ways off...

most impressive stat to me: 1.07 billion colors<p>my how far we&#x27;ve come from the good ol&#x27; days of CRT

And to think I thought the Thunderbolt display was pricey at $1k. I love it, but I don&#x27;t think I could possible realize (or notice) the increase in capability unless working heavily in graphics and video, and that&#x27;s assuming that the machine attached to it has a card that takes advantage of it.

I&#x27;d be very happy with an 8-bit colour 2560x1600 24&quot; monitor. It would be more affordable and way easier for graphics cards to run, why is no-one making one of these!?

Dude. Sweet! If the price is reasonable, I&#x27;ll buy 2-4 for my desktop. I&#x27;d love to have the knock-off cheap dead pixels Korean version even more, actually.

I&#x27;ve been looking at a higher resolution monitor than my 30&quot; Dell and found that there are these things called &quot;TVs&quot; that apparently have 4K resolution but in 55&quot; format.<p>I&#x27;m after screen real estate and want to see a lot of code at the same time. Does anyone have any thoughts about replacing my 30&quot; work monitor with a 55&quot; TV with a lot more resolution?