TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

P = NP

34 点作者 gzanitti超过 11 年前

6 条评论

saidajigumi超过 11 年前
[Meta: please submit the direct link, not a link-shortened version]<p>This arXiv paper[1] is apparently from 2012. A good meta-resource and summary of attempts on P ?= NP, including this one, can be found at [2]. From [2]:<p>&gt; Among all these papers, there is only a single paper that has appeared in a peer-reviewed journal, that has thoroughly been verified by the experts in the area, and whose correctness is accepted by the general research community: The paper by Mihalis Yannakakis. (And this paper does not settle the P-versus-NP question, but &quot;just&quot; shows that a certain approach to settling this question will never work out.)<p>[1] arXiv summary: <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0954" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;1208.0954</a><p>[2] <a href="http://www.win.tue.nl/~gwoegi/P-versus-NP.htm" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.win.tue.nl&#x2F;~gwoegi&#x2F;P-versus-NP.htm</a>
fishtoaster超过 11 年前
Some context would be helpful. Is the a credible computer scientist, or just another crackpot? What has been the response of the mathematical community to this? What, if any, are the criticisms of it?<p>It looks like there have been a number of versions of this paper since last year: <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0954" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;abs&#x2F;1208.0954</a><p>So, has anything changed?
mabbo超过 11 年前
Wasn&#x27;t this submitted this morning? At which point the community agreed that it was a crackpot?<p>Why do I get the feeling the same person submitted it again hoping to catch the late-night readers off-guard...
评论 #6852308 未加载
alvare超过 11 年前
<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/sergeyvyakhontov/home/peqnp-paper-status" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sites.google.com&#x2F;site&#x2F;sergeyvyakhontov&#x2F;home&#x2F;peqnp-pa...</a>
Refefer超过 11 年前
...this would be a huge deal if verified. Anyone with the background to understand this able to reduce the paper presented into more manageable terms?
wtpiu超过 11 年前
chrome can&#x27;t verify authenticity of this link
评论 #6852240 未加载