A few things (I'm the author of InfiniSQL)<p>1) I include keystore-like stored procedures in the source. They do get/set with integer key and string val. I haven't done thorough benchmarking, but I expect them to outperform the other benchmark I've published, which is quite a bit more complex workload<p>2) (camus2) agreed, nothing ever dies in IT. <i>But</i> roll back the clock a few years. How much noSQL would come into exisence if there was a free xzySQL that scaled across nodes, was fast, etc. I believe the answer is that there'd be very few network-based noSQL for operational workloads if that had been the case.<p>3) jwatte: Yeah! Jagged edges too!<p>4) stephen24: Also, I intend to change the license from AGPL to GPL next time I push out some code. No excuse not to try it out.<p>5) siliconc0w: There's an architectural write-up at High Scalability: <a href="http://highscalability.com/blog/2013/11/25/how-to-make-an-infinitely-scalable-relational-database-manag.html" rel="nofollow">http://highscalability.com/blog/2013/11/25/how-to-make-an-in...</a> -- I believe that the actor model architecture is distinct in InfiniSQL.<p>6) diwu1989: Yes and no. Yes, MemSQL is more mature. No,<p>(a) I'm not sure how MemSQL scales horizontally (especially since that was a feature added after v1 of their code was released), and,<p>(b) MemSQL isn't free software<p>7) itsbits: for now InfiniSQL is mainly for hackers and early adopters--the dependencies are pretty clearly documented but it requires some effort to work with in its current state