TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Flights of fancy - Why airborne automobiles will never take off

8 点作者 emontero1将近 16 年前

6 条评论

zck将近 16 年前
I think there's another problem -- ease of driving. When driving a car, you don't have to make many choices. Any directional choice is binary: do I turn right here or not? As long as you stay on a road, the choices are limited for you. Driving doesn't tax the mind. In an airplane, you have 360 degrees of choice in addition to your climbing or descending angle. Drivers of air cars will have to take a cue from airline pilots today, and set a heading, and then correct it later. This requires more effort and planning than driving down Rt. 1 until the third stoplight, than turning left. It's more of a mental load than many drivers are willing to take.<p>Also, when driving a car, you can use the brakes as a safety valve -- just hit them if anything goes wrong. On any road, at any time, you can stop the car and deal with the problem. There's nothing like that in an airplane; you can't just land anywhere you want, anytime (there might even be other airplanes below you, so you can't even descend).<p>The first problem could be solved by having intelligent autopilot -- GPS with control over the system. The second could be solved by having air cars that could hover.
pg将近 16 年前
It's usually a mistake to say never about technology. The future is very long. Your correspondent would have done better to pitch this as an argument about why flying cars are harder than people think, and say precisely what would have to happen to make them work.
评论 #688110 未加载
评论 #688327 未加载
评论 #688020 未加载
bprater将近 16 年前
At any moment, anti-gravity could be discovered and we would be off to the races! Never say never!
asdlfj2sd33将近 16 年前
<i>The problems then, as now, were more regulatory than technical or economic. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was aghast at the volume of additional air traffic Ford had in mind. The air-traffic control systems of the day would have been overwhelmed. Ford promptly abandoned the idea, even though its flying car would have been cheaper to build and operate than the helicopters that subsequently took over most of their intended roles.</i><p>Is this true?
RiderOfGiraffes将近 16 年前
Comments also at: <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=687191" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=687191</a>
staunch将近 16 年前
They need built in parachutes for the whole plane. That way amateurs can just screw everything up and hit the parachute button.
评论 #687963 未加载