TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

BItcoin misconceptions

4 点作者 floorlamp超过 11 年前

2 条评论

nrs26超过 11 年前
&gt;I don&#x27;t need to use bitcoin. &gt;Did you need to use the Internet in 1993?<p>I think this is actually the most interesting point. The truth is that, no, you don&#x27;t actually need to use bitcoin right now. And that&#x27;s different than not needing to use the internet in 1993. Right now, there are plenty of substitute goods - more stable, more accessible currency that is used by more people. In 1993 there weren&#x27;t that many substitute products for the internet.<p>Said another way: I wanted to do something like send a text string to another person in 1993, the internet was my only option. But if I want to do something like purchase an item right now: there are tons of other ways of doing it.<p>So, In order to convince me that I need to use bitcoin, the benefits of using it need to outweigh the costs, risks and hassle of converting my money.<p>From a ideological perspective, I think this really appeals to the HN community (including me). But from a practical standpoint, I can&#x27;t see this catching on with enough average consumers to really become a stable currency.
评论 #6897203 未加载
kdeforche超过 11 年前
&gt;That&#x27;s because with POS systems, you&#x27;re not waiting for 6 confirmations. It&#x27;s just assumed that you won&#x27;t try to double spend your coins, and that no forks or orphans in the block chain happen. This is not 100% reliable - if you wanted a guaranteed, irreversable transaction immediately, well, you&#x27;re out of luck. Permanent or immediate: pick one.<p>Actually, in absence of double spends, forks or orphans are innocent: valid transactions (w.r.t a chain) that are not part of a block will be picked up eventually by the main chain. So there&#x27;s only an (expensive&#x2F;complicated) double spend risk, and not a (more common) orphan block risk.