TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Krugman's Three Money Pits

28 点作者 tjaerv超过 11 年前

8 条评论

isamuel超过 11 年前
Krugman, a week ago:<p>&gt; I have had and am continuing to have a dialogue with smart technologists who are very high on BitCoin — but when I try to get them to explain to me why BitCoin is a reliable store of value, they always seem to come back with explanations about how it’s a terrific medium of exchange.<p><a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/bitcoin-is-evil/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;krugman.blogs.nytimes.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;12&#x2F;28&#x2F;bitcoin-is-evil&#x2F;</a><p>This guy:<p>&gt; [I]f bitcoin has an intrinsic value, it is as a medium of transferring value globally with almost no transaction costs, an incredible boon to the citizens of developing countries who work in developed nations and currently pay 10% commissions to send home remittances.<p>You can&#x27;t say that the man doesn&#x27;t know his debate opponents.
评论 #7009206 未加载
mynameishere超过 11 年前
Krugman criticizes bitcoin because it has no utility while consuming resources. As a counter-argument, they bring up Krugman&#x27;s habit of flying on airplanes. Okay, so that argument proves one thing only: You have no real counter-argument. Just admit it.<p>Back when I used to trade stocks, I discovered an unnerving psychological problem with it: No matter the news related to the respective company, having $100,000 riding on it makes you a cheerleader. I was holding Merck when the Vioxx scandal came out, and I somehow tried to justify that to myself--no matter how many people it killed. I think this phenomenon is common. Okay, so you own worthless hash strings, and because you paid real money for them, you&#x27;re their cheerleader.<p>When you sell, you&#x27;ll be their detractor. That always happens, too.
评论 #7009507 未加载
评论 #7009625 未加载
leot超过 11 年前
Look, Bitcoin is without a doubt super cool; but to claim that the macroeconomics of it are known to be sound is utter folly. <i>No one knows</i> what would happen in an economy based increasingly around a deflationary currency, and there are lots of hints suggesting the outcome could be pretty grim.<p>At the very least, it seems like to be a very big (and disruptive) change. Fingers crossed ... !!
评论 #7009614 未加载
评论 #7009303 未加载
aagha超过 11 年前
When it comes to econ-related issues, he&#x27;s worth reading--at least it&#x27;s interesting.<p>For non-econ-related issues, not so much. This quote from 1985:<p>&quot;The growth of the Internet will slow drastically, as the flaw in &#x27;Metcalfe&#x27;s law&#x27;–which states that the number of potential connections in a network is proportional to the square of the number of participants–becomes apparent: most people have nothing to say to each other! By 2005 or so, it will become clear that the Internet&#x27;s impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine&#x27;s.&quot; [0]<p>[0] <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/paul-krugman-responds-to-internet-quote-2013-12" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.businessinsider.com&#x2F;paul-krugman-responds-to-inte...</a>
评论 #7009712 未加载
评论 #7009327 未加载
评论 #7009578 未加载
Tloewald超过 11 年前
Appealing to &quot;NSA-approved cryptography&quot; in the concluding paragraph is more than a trifle strange. One of the big problems with bitcoin, in my opinion, is that for all we know it&#x27;s a honey trap created by an intelligence organization.
评论 #7011086 未加载
nickbauman超过 11 年前
The article fails on the basic premise that government activity in the economy is self-evidentially &quot;bad&quot; and non-government activity in the economy is self-evidentially &quot;good&quot;. Government activity versus private activity is no more or less bad than the other.<p>Take Denmark. Something like 55% of the population works for the government. Yet nobody would compare that country to, say, Russia. Or Egypt. Or Syria. The article is just pure ideology on its face. Which is to say, it&#x27;s all about people wishing to fit reality into their own bias, not examine reality to form a testable hypotheses.
评论 #7009799 未加载
评论 #7010022 未加载
jhdkjqhkjqhwk超过 11 年前
&gt; NSA-approved cryptographic algorithms<p>this was written in 2014 without a trace of irony.
late2part超过 11 年前
Krugman is a moron. Just ignore him, he&#x27;ll go away soon.
评论 #7009448 未加载
评论 #7009212 未加载