TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Poll HN: What is your personality type?

120 点作者 justhw超过 11 年前
Just curious HN. What is your personality type? If you&#x27;re not aware of the 16 personalities learn more here[1,2]. If you have not taken the test, do here[3].<p>Don&#x27;t forget to up vote the poll to get more data.<p>Inspired by, http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.avc.com&#x2F;a_vc&#x2F;2013&#x2F;08&#x2F;fun-friday-what-is-your-myers-briggs-personality-type.html<p>1. http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Personality_type 2. http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.personalitypage.com&#x2F;high-level.html 3. http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.16personalities.com&#x2F;free-personality-test<p>Visualize this poll: http:&#x2F;&#x2F;hnlike.com&#x2F;hncharts&#x2F;chart&#x2F;?id=7033047

53 条评论

octo_t超过 11 年前
I was under the impression the Meyer-Briggs was essentially pseudo-science?
评论 #7033230 未加载
评论 #7033141 未加载
评论 #7033531 未加载
评论 #7033221 未加载
评论 #7033223 未加载
评论 #7033144 未加载
评论 #7033793 未加载
评论 #7033145 未加载
评论 #7033292 未加载
pstack超过 11 年前
I don&#x27;t need a test to know I&#x27;m an asshole.
评论 #7033307 未加载
discostrings超过 11 年前
Here are some statistics for each trait as of 16:00 PST:<p>I 71.77% - E 28.23% (General population: I 50.90% - E 49.40%)<p>N 90.73% - S 9.27% (General population: N 26.90% - S 73.40%)<p>T 77.16% - F 22.84% (General population: T 40.40% - F 59.90%)<p>P 49.57% - J 50.43% (General population: P 46.00% - J 54.30%)<p>And the personality types reported here in comparison to the general population (from the MBTI Manual, 3rd edition, published in 1998):<p>ISTJ General 11.60% - HN: 2.37%<p>ISFJ General 13.80% - HN: 0.97%<p>ISTP General 5.40% - HN: 2.05%<p>ISFP General 8.80% - HN: 0.86%<p>ESTP General 4.30% - HN: 0.97%<p>ESFP General 8.50% - HN: 0.65%<p>ESTJ General 8.70% - HN: 0.65%<p>ESFJ General 12.30% - HN: 0.75%<p>ENTJ General 1.80% - HN: 7.44%<p>ENTP General 3.20% - HN: 9.91%<p>ENFJ General 2.50% - HN: 1.94%<p>ENFP General 8.10% - HN: 5.93%<p>INTJ General 2.10% - HN: 31.36%<p>INTP General 3.30% - HN: 22.41%<p>INFJ General 1.50% - HN: 4.96%<p>INFP General 4.40% - HN: 6.79%<p>Edit: Updated statistics at 16:00 PST
_xhok超过 11 年前
Everyone saying &quot;I don&#x27;t need to take a test to know what kind of person I am&quot; is missing the point of MBTI. It&#x27;s not a test you take to judge yourself, but one that helps you understand other people.<p>The sixteen types aren&#x27;t buckets that people fall neatly into. What they represent are sixteen hypothetical extreme individuals. The model ENTJ would be exactly as described on personality type pages--demanding, unfeeling, unafraid to tell others what dumbshits they are. But no one is a complete ENTJ. The helpfulness of MBTI is that when someone does things that a complete ENTJ might do, it helps to know what their motivation might be, and why they&#x27;re driven to be that way. When the same person acts like an ENFP, same thing.
gjm11超过 11 年前
Those lamenting the fact that &quot;asshole&quot; isn&#x27;t one of the available types might like to try instead the Lipson-Shiu Corporate Type test: <a href="http://www.andrewlipson.com/lstest.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.andrewlipson.com&#x2F;lstest.html</a><p>&quot;The Lipson-Shiu test attempts to remedy this and other oversights by classifying along four alternative axes: Intelligent-Stupid; Lawful-Chaotic; Important-Unimportant; Good-Evil.&quot;
评论 #7033927 未加载
igravious超过 11 年前
My personality type is the &quot;I don&#x27;t believe in personality types&quot; type.
评论 #7033165 未加载
评论 #7033253 未加载
评论 #7033268 未加载
评论 #7033251 未加载
cabbeer超过 11 年前
I think the my result will change depending on the mood I am in when taking the test. Describing yourself accurately, not just truthfully, (even in the constraint of the test) is very hard to do.
cowmoo超过 11 年前
Uhh, I really hate INTJ personalities, most are so uptight centered on being judgmental. The &quot;worker bee&quot; personality that I see at IT&#x2F;software places.<p>INFP ftw, feeling up and perceiving people over thinking and judging people!
评论 #7033570 未加载
评论 #7033417 未加载
评论 #7033961 未加载
评论 #7033744 未加载
评论 #7034114 未加载
adnam超过 11 年前
On the one hand, Myers-Brigg is &quot;pseudoscience&quot;. On the other, most HN-readers are INTP or INTJ, as expected.
austenallred超过 11 年前
This is a really difficult poll for me, and honestly it changed once I started learning to code (3 or 4 months ago).<p>I used to read comments and articles of people that liked quiet space and time to think, or of people who hated open office spaces, and think, &quot;They probably just don&#x27;t like being around people,&quot; or even &quot;They probably just don&#x27;t like <i>people</i>.&quot; I thought that the idea of being &quot;wired in&quot; was just as ridiculous as someone calling themselves a &quot;rockstar,&quot; or &quot;killing it,&quot; and was something that most people pretend to do because it seems cool in the movies but nobody really does.<p>Then I started to program. Nothing earth-shattering and no big data, just simple applications with a little bit of logic behind them, and everything changed.<p>The little chat and text notifications would kill my concentration and make me lose large chunks of time and thought. A good pair of headphones wasn&#x27;t just for music, but for blocking out the rest of the world (even soft, classical music was too distracting to my thought process). There was some really cool stuff happening, and I had created it.<p>And sometimes, to be frank, the code is more interesting than the social situation I tend to be in. It&#x27;s not that I don&#x27;t like people, but even though I consider myself an extrovert (or I used to be an extravert?) I would rather be in a quiet room coding.<p>My parents say they saw at an early age how intense I was when I played video games (and how agressive I became), and forever banned them at my house and in my life. I feel like that was a major determining force in my personality and who I am today.<p>Now it feels like there are two people fighting inside of me. I can still go to a party and really enjoy myself, I&#x27;m still late all the time, and I still am on the more extraverted side of a lot of the answers and laugh it up and have a very wide circle of friends and barely-acquaintences I love to keep in touch with, but sometimes (and a growing amount of the time) I just want to be left alone so I can figure things out. And I don&#x27;t crave to be around people like I used to.<p>It&#x27;s not hard, when taking a test like this, to see which personality type the answers are lending themselves to, and most of the time when taking them I am thinking to myself, &quot;It depends.&quot; I really don&#x27;t know anymore. And interestingly enough, I feel like my personality is more a result of the <i>things I do</i> than <i>who I am</i>.<p>For the record: I scored Extravert(44%) iNtuitive(62%) Feeling(62%) Perceiving(67)%
评论 #7034498 未加载
dec0dedab0de超过 11 年前
I&#x27;ve taken 4 or 5 versions of this test many times over the last 14 years, and have always gotten the same result. Even when I went back and answered differently for questions I was on the fence for. The description was always very accurate too, but I don&#x27;t like the Idea that there are only 16 models of people.
评论 #7033877 未加载
IgorPartola超过 11 年前
Off-topic: My personality type is such that I click upvote randomly on HN polls. &lt;&#x2F;joke&gt; This has been the obligatory reminder that HN poll results are meaningless. All ESFP&#x27;s are just asleep at this time of day.<p>On-topic: No surprise INTJ is fairly well represented. Logical introverts are a stereotype of our industry.
swalsh超过 11 年前
I love how INTJ is described as &quot;rare&quot; but is by far the highest one here.
评论 #7033724 未加载
评论 #7033734 未加载
tokenadult超过 11 年前
Obligatory references on the subject of the unvalidated Myers-Briggs Type Indicator®:<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-leadership/myers-briggs-does-it-pay-to-know-your-type/2012/12/14/eaed51ae-3fcc-11e2-bca3-aadc9b7e29c5_story.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.washingtonpost.com&#x2F;national&#x2F;on-leadership&#x2F;myers-b...</a><p>&quot;Now, 50 years after the first time anyone paid money for the test, the Myers-Briggs legacy is reaching the end of the family line. The youngest heirs don’t want it. And it’s not clear whether organizations should, either.<p>. . . .<p>&quot;Yet despite its widespread use and vast financial success, and although it was derived from the work of Carl Jung, one of the most famous psychologists of the 20th century, the test is highly questioned by the scientific community.&quot;<p><a href="http://www.skepdic.com/myersb.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.skepdic.com&#x2F;myersb.html</a><p><a href="http://www.psychometric-success.com/personality-tests/personality-tests-popular-tests.htm" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.psychometric-success.com&#x2F;personality-tests&#x2F;person...</a><p>&quot;Overall, the review committee concluded that the MBTI has not demonstrated adequate validity although its popularity and use has been steadily increasing. The National Academy of Sciences review committee concluded that: &#x27;at this time, there is not sufficient, well-designed research to justify the use of the MBTI in career counseling programs,&#x27; the very thing that it is most often used for.&quot;<p><a href="http://www.indiana.edu/~jobtalk/HRMWebsite/hrm/articles/develop/mbti.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.indiana.edu&#x2F;~jobtalk&#x2F;HRMWebsite&#x2F;hrm&#x2F;articles&#x2F;deve...</a><p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Cult-Personality-Testing-Annie-Murphy/dp/0743280725" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Cult-Personality-Testing-Annie-Murphy&#x2F;...</a><p>Please, ladies and gentlemen who participate on Hacker News, do yourselves the favor to read some psychological research literature that was written after you were born, so that you find out that the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® was never widely accepted by psychologists and that it now languishes on the ash heap of history. For a long time now, factor-analytic models of human personality have been the fruitful research paradigm, and currently the Big Five model<p><a href="http://www.tc.umn.edu/~cdeyoung/Pubs/DeYoung_Intelligence-Personality_Chapter.pdf" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.tc.umn.edu&#x2F;~cdeyoung&#x2F;Pubs&#x2F;DeYoung_Intelligence-Pe...</a><p>enjoys a fair amount of research support across multiple countries with some good confirmation by multiple researchers. The Big Five theory still needs work, but it is much more productive of understanding human personality than the Myers-Briggs model ever was.<p><i>Don&#x27;t forget to up vote the poll to get more data.</i><p>Note that the HN poll here suffers BIG-TIME from all the usual problems of voluntary response polls, just like the Literary Digest poll that failed in predicting the result of the 1936 United States presidential election despite a high response rate.
评论 #7033607 未加载
评论 #7033622 未加载
yc-kjh超过 11 年前
There is a better way to visualize it.<p>Do click on the link: <a href="http://hnlike.com/hncharts/chart/?id=7033047" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;hnlike.com&#x2F;hncharts&#x2F;chart&#x2F;?id=7033047</a><p>Unfortunately, this chart is arranged badly. But you can glean the information by comparing columns.<p>First huge difference: N &gt; S (biggest of all!) Next difference: T &gt; F (more pronounced amongst Ns) Next difference: I &gt; E (more pronounced amongst NTs)<p>Note that there is almost no difference along the J&#x2F;P axis.
merloen超过 11 年前
I get the I&#x2F;E distinction, I understand the F&#x2F;T dimension, but I&#x27;ve never read a good explanation of N&#x2F;S and J&#x2F;P. Anyone care to explain?
评论 #7033394 未加载
评论 #7033458 未加载
评论 #7033465 未加载
joelgreen超过 11 年前
As a programmer &#x2F; startup founder, I feel like I oscillate between INTJ and ENTJ.
seiji超过 11 年前
Which one is &quot;caustic bastard?&quot;
评论 #7033300 未加载
criswell超过 11 年前
The &quot;rarest&quot; personality type (ENTP)[<a href="http://www.16personalities.com/intj-personality" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.16personalities.com&#x2F;intj-personality</a>] has the most up votes. I don&#x27;t know why I saw that coming but I did. A very interesting community here.
alex_c超过 11 年前
It&#x27;s been different every time I&#x27;ve taken the test.
BjoernKW超过 11 年前
Why is that important exactly? To know in which pigeon hole I belong? Don&#x27;t get me wrong. It&#x27;s vital to be aware of one&#x27;s traits, strengths and weaknesses but I&#x27;m not a D&amp;D character. Defining people by four-letter groups seems just weird to me.
aaronsnoswell超过 11 年前
Interesting, the website links states that INTJ&#x27;s are less than 2% of general population, yet they consist of about 30$ of responses to this poll, confirming HN is not a standard subset of the general populace.
etfb超过 11 年前
I&#x27;m a QWBX - that&#x27;s the personality type for people who think pseudoscientific bullshit like the MBTI doesn&#x27;t belong in the boardrooms, factory floors and minds of the human race.
评论 #7033857 未加载
yvsong超过 11 年前
Who are &quot;hackers&quot; here? Software engineers?<p>Curious about the type distribution of IT entrepreneurs (founders, co-founders, CEO&#x27;s, and CTO&#x27;s).
评论 #7034965 未加载
USNetizen超过 11 年前
I could have sworn INTJ is supposedly the rarest of types, found in only about 1% of people, and yet it has by far the most votes here.
评论 #7033515 未加载
alexmic超过 11 年前
Even thought I generally think these sort of tests are rubbish it turns out I&#x27;m, quite accurately, an ISFP.
wingerlang超过 11 年前
This kind of test annoys me to no end, when they rephrase the same questions over and over and over again. I am sure there is some point to it, and the profile I hit very close to home.<p>I don&#x27;t really care for it though, especially since the site is obviously just trying to make people buy the full-depth profile.<p>Fun, I guess.
lakesta超过 11 年前
So far we&#x27;re proving the %&#x27;s wrong with all of these INTJ&#x27;s (2% worldwide or something)!
评论 #7033193 未加载
评论 #7033192 未加载
ankitoberoi超过 11 年前
Oh great, I&#x27;m a ENTJ just like Steve Jobs &amp; Jim Carrey.<p>So, Steve and Jim both were similar in personality?
schpet超过 11 年前
&quot;the INTJ may become obsessed with mindless repetitive, Sensate activities&quot; <a href="http://www.personalitypage.com/INTJ.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.personalitypage.com&#x2F;INTJ.html</a>
blooberr超过 11 年前
I don&#x27;t put too much belief in the tests, but when all your close friends are INTJ and you&#x27;re the only ENFP.. the test helps you recognize why you&#x27;re a little different from the rest of them.
bennyg超过 11 年前
ENTP all day, all night.
bcoates超过 11 年前
What are the distributions on the answers? I always get xxxP where the first three are always around neutral and I&#x27;m P off the charts, whatever the hell that means.
robinhoodexe超过 11 年前
I&#x27;ve taken this test 4 times or so over the past 5 years, each time with a different result. Not quite science in my book, but definitely something to reflect upon.
评论 #7033318 未加载
tpae超过 11 年前
are all hackers INTJ..?
评论 #7033409 未加载
评论 #7033275 未加载
评论 #7033216 未加载
评论 #7033273 未加载
jagbolanos超过 11 年前
Not sure if this happens to others but in my case some times I&#x27;m ENTP and others INTP. I guess I&#x27;m somehow in the middle and it might depend on the day.
erobbins超过 11 年前
I always get either ISTP or INTP, depending on the N&#x2F;S questions.<p>I like to understand the risky situations I find myself in.
pmelendez超过 11 年前
Interesting but not surprisingly INTJ has most votes being one of the rarest of the personality types.
dmak超过 11 年前
32% of HN is part of the rarest personality type? I cannot help but laugh.
igravious超过 11 年前
I got my mother to do it and entered her result, does that count?
mh_yam超过 11 年前
Not surprised at the number of INTs. Fair number of ENT as well.
kintamanimatt超过 11 年前
C&#x27;mon, HN is better than this psuedo-science. If it were a poll asking for sun and rising signs it&#x27;d get flamed and flagged to death.<p>People need better critical thinking skills.
jeremyswank超过 11 年前
melancholic, with a soupçon of wry derision.
bobosha超过 11 年前
The &quot;I&quot;s have it
crorella超过 11 年前
So many INTJ I guess it makes sense given the kind of website we use :D
umren超过 11 年前
typical INTJ most of the time :(
ahamino超过 11 年前
INFJ
woohoou超过 11 年前
INTP
usetheinternet超过 11 年前
ENFJ
concone超过 11 年前
INFJ
zw123456超过 11 年前
ICIE
angersock超过 11 年前
I consider myself dynamically-typed.<p>Comedy answer: single and unloved.<p>EDIT:<p>Last time I took this, ENTJ. Now, ENFP. I&#x27;m apparently going soft.
derleth3超过 11 年前
INTJ