The company I work for conducts quarterly performance reviews. As a member of our small QA team I've been ask to help define this process. A lot of what I do is identifying issues and collaborating with the devs to reach a solution.<p>How should performance review for QA be conducted? Would any hard metric be useful?<p>I fear that if a metric were ‘number of issues identified’ (for example), that might lead to a focus on creating a large number of issues. That scenario would not bring any value.<p>Any suggestions would be appreciated.