TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

3D-printed Aerospike Rocket Engine

60 点作者 pnr超过 11 年前

8 条评论

olympus超过 11 年前
I&#x27;m not sure this is really a good fit for a Kickstarter project. I love rockets&#x2F;space&#x2F;science&#x2F;etc and fully support researching cheaper launch methods, but for most people to invest, they want to get something back. There are very few people who will&#x2F;can donate to something on a purely altruistic basis. These guys aren&#x27;t a charity and I can&#x27;t even get a tax write-off. Pushing a button, while cool, is not really a return on investment and only rocketry enthusiasts with extra money (a rare combination) will be willing to pay for that. The cheaper reward tiers offer a &quot;Master-Class on 3d printing and rocket science&quot; which will have more backers due to the 3d printing information but probably not enough to clear their goal.<p>I think a better way to spur investment would be offering a reward tier that gives a portion of the company (i.e., a $x investment gets you a y% stake in the company). This is just selling stock in a company off of Wall Street and probably a better fit for a company that isn&#x27;t offering services or a physical product to the general public. I&#x27;m not sure what kind of regulations you have to follow (or if kickstarter would even allow it) but it would certainly open up the field of potential backers to include the folks that know&#x2F;care nothing about rockets but would like to make some money when the company is inevitably bought out by a larger space launch company like SpaceX.
评论 #7141741 未加载
评论 #7141413 未加载
评论 #7141465 未加载
评论 #7141941 未加载
butThenAgain超过 11 年前
I&#x27;d be enthusiastic about nano-satallites, if the space-fairing component of human civilization had established reliable processes for keeping low earth orbit clean and free of orbiting pollution, debris and junk.<p>The last thing we need is more high-velocity objects being randomly inserted into orbit by hobbyists, when there&#x27;s no reliable means to clean up the objects left in orbit by predecessors.<p><a href="http://images.gizmag.com/inline/space-debris-kessler-syndrome-nasa-debrisat-7.jpg" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;images.gizmag.com&#x2F;inline&#x2F;space-debris-kessler-syndrom...</a><p>How about a startup&#x2F;kickstarter that harvests existing space junk, instead of one that encourages people to haphazardly produce more?
评论 #7141983 未加载
Cogito超过 11 年前
This is really cool.<p>I would love to see more details about how the engines are 3d printed, and the plans for the designs. Will these engine designs be open sourced?<p>Also, the rewards are a little difficult to parse. A list format would probably be easier to read, rather than one sentence with each reward concatenated to the rest with &#x27;and&#x27;. I think having the &#x27;all previous rewards plus ...&#x27; is a better format as well, but that is more personal preference.<p>[EDIT]<p>Further, there is no break down of how the money will be used. It seems like &#x27;give us money and we&#x27;ll do cool things with it&#x27; but without any clarification of how much money is really needed to do those cool things.<p>[EDIT2]<p>There is a pretty amazing blog over at Rocket Moonlighting [0] that contains a lot of details around 3d printed rocket engines. Well worth a look.<p>[0] <a href="http://rocketmoonlighting.blogspot.co.nz/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;rocketmoonlighting.blogspot.co.nz&#x2F;</a>
评论 #7141964 未加载
johlindenbaum超过 11 年前
After being on a team that was launching cube sats with old ICBMs this reusable launch platform for science excites me!
评论 #7141195 未加载
Gravityloss超过 11 年前
Pet peeve: this is a spike nozzle, not an aerospike.<p>The aerospike engine has a truncated physical spike that is extended by an &quot;aerospike&quot; that is formed by the pressurized turbine exhaust.<p>It&#x27;s still crude and early, but it&#x27;s very nice that people are actually building rocket stuff! Too bad ITAR is a problem...
评论 #7145457 未加载
Geee超过 11 年前
Hey nadirkazan. With 3D printing, could it be possible and affordable to make really tiny rocket engines for other uses, like radio controlled flying things? I&#x27;m thinking something like a moon lander, but smaller (really small, quadrocopter size). I would buy that :)
评论 #7146132 未加载
评论 #7146303 未加载
VladRussian2超过 11 年前
is it subject to ITAR?
评论 #7141163 未加载
评论 #7141727 未加载
评论 #7141561 未加载
mkw5053超过 11 年前
This timeline is not realistic. No discussion of a control system at all for guidance and (more difficult) stability.
评论 #7146372 未加载