TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask Google to choose your next domain

102 点作者 bernardjhuang超过 11 年前

8 条评论

joelrunyon超过 11 年前
I spent a lot of money on Google in the RV industry (to the tune of $500,000&#x2F;month for a certain fortune 500 company) &amp; there are a lot of issues with this post:<p>First up, his stats across the board aren&#x27;t even close. His impressions vary by a factor of 4 for the different ads. From that alone, I bet he forgot to turn of the &quot;optimize my ads&quot; setting from Google and switch on &quot;rotate evenly&quot;.<p>The &quot;optimize my ads&quot; feature sounds like a good thing to leave checked, but like most things is designed to make Google more money. That setting basically allows Google to start optimizing whichever ad gets out in front first - which doesn&#x27;t let you figure out which one is actually superior. So the data is tainted from the start.<p>Also,<p>&gt; The .co domains have a performance penalty versus their .com brethren but the differences should be proportional.<p>Where do you get this from? In PPC I haven&#x27;t seen any studies on this at all. I could understand .com leakage on .co domains for people typing it in directly out of habit, but Google doesn&#x27;t penalize ads based on their TLD.<p>Not to take away from the strategy (it&#x27;s a great idea &amp; this is exactly how Tim Ferriss picked the name for his Four Hour Work Week back in 2007[1]), but there&#x27;s a lot of flaws with this specific example.<p>[1] <a href="http://boingboing.net/2010/10/25/howto-use-google-adw.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;boingboing.net&#x2F;2010&#x2F;10&#x2F;25&#x2F;howto-use-google-adw.html</a>
评论 #7147387 未加载
评论 #7147414 未加载
评论 #7149195 未加载
评论 #7148489 未加载
sp332超过 11 年前
<i>The ads started on January 2 and took 6 days to hit 98% statistical confidence.</i><p>No! You have to pick the time first, wait that amount of time, and later analyze how much confidence you achieved. With random variations, you could have a run of any size of positive or negative results, and you could just wait until you get the result you want. Sorry but tons of people make this mistake with A&#x2F;B tests.
评论 #7148576 未加载
评论 #7146956 未加载
评论 #7148369 未加载
评论 #7146792 未加载
elchief超过 11 年前
Protip: Google &quot;buy domain name&quot;, look for ads from godaddy or other registrars. Can usually get domains for a buck instead of ten bucks.
评论 #7147900 未加载
评论 #7149935 未加载
jgmmo超过 11 年前
&#x27;RV Menu&#x27; is a RV recipe&#x2F;food keyword, not a rental-related keyword.
评论 #7146987 未加载
评论 #7148177 未加载
togedoge超过 11 年前
Why is there no mention of Average Position of each ad? That impacts CTR wildly! I can&#x27;t take this post seriously without seeing more data.
caseyf7超过 11 年前
Why wouldn&#x27;t you get the domain with the most impressions and then work to improve the click-thru rate? (other than Joel&#x27;s great point about Google controlling impressions)
评论 #7148702 未加载
User8712超过 11 年前
So, were these ads actually appearing evening across the same sites or search results, and in the same locations? If rvmenu.com appeared more frequently in one location than the others, that would skew the entire results.<p>I&#x27;m not convinced with the data you posted. The sample is small, and there&#x27;s a lot of unknowns in the testing parameters. I wouldn&#x27;t advise anyone to take this approach when selecting a domain.
pbhjpbhj超过 11 年前
Perhaps ... &quot;rv menu&quot; appears to perform well because those looking for food menus for when they are off in their RV are interested in just _looking_ at RVs? Did they mainly click the expensive ones? [That&#x27;s what I&#x27;d do, like &quot;ooh, fancy; I&#x27;d like one of those&quot;]<p>Interest, indeed clicks, don&#x27;t mean revenue will follow unless they were actual sales actions.<p>Now, it could also be that you can sell RV hire to people researching for an RV trip using &quot;RV menu&quot; ...