If one existed, made their financial data public, did not provide additional 3rd party services (hosting, email, etc) and therefore was unable to offer below cost discounted pricing, would you prefer to use a non-profit registrar? Why or why not?
Non-profits are not charities.<p>For the most part, they are tax-privledged special interest groups. They really don't need any special "help" in the world. Unfortunately, this system has been "hacked" by tax and wealth management professionals. The examples range from the NFL to MOMA to Ivy League Universities, each harboring $10's of billions of capital, that is used to pay and protect already incredibly wealthy patrons and their benefactors.<p>As such, using their tax-exemption as a form of marketing is highly suspect. And, lets face it, this is the purpose of self-identification. The terms "non-profit" for example is merely calculated to express empathy; it fails to highlight "tax-dodge" or "income & asset laundering".<p>The notion that "non-profit" entities run $30Bn hedge funds and pay executive salaries in the multiple millions of $USD, all while being granted tax and regulatory exemptions, is <i>something to think about</i>.
Yes, for the same reasons that Credit Unions are better than Banks. Watching out for the customer, in a principled way, is a great selling point. But it would also need to be stable, for the long term, which means profitable and large enough to survive the bad times.<p>DNS + simple hosting + support, is an ideal market for a non-profit focused on free speech and democratic participation.
No. There are a lot of things I care about in a registrar but it being a non-profit is not one of those things.<p>I care how it handles my domains, policy and all that jazz, particularly in cases of hacks, take downs, etc...<p>I care about customer service.<p>I care about some options it offers that is and can genuinely be useful.<p>I care about what it does right or wrong.<p>Basically things that affect me and my domains/businesses.