TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Misrepresentation of Fuel Surcharges in Airline Price Advertising

42 点作者 danielsiders超过 11 年前

5 条评论

ams6110超过 11 年前
Splintering the total cost into fare and various taxes, surcharges, and fees is likely an attempt to make direct price comparisons with competitors more difficult. I.e. advertising the base "fare" and only revealing the additional charges at purchase time. Wireless providers, cable/internet companies, etc. all do it too.
评论 #7167793 未加载
评论 #7168792 未加载
pedalpete超过 11 年前
I just did some back of the napkin calculations on actual fuel costs for the reported BOS-LHR. I find the OPs description difficult to follow, but assuming a 777 from BOS-LHR<p>6000 gallons &#x2F; hour of flight<p>$3 &#x2F; gallon (currently $2.92)<p>550 passengers &#x2F; flight<p>6 hours flight time<p>Results in an actual fuel cost of $193.36.<p>I&#x27;m quite surprised to see that fuel really is a significant price of the total cost of a flight. I always thought the Fuel Surcharge thing was B.S.<p>However, I disagree that it should be allowed to be separated from the cost of the flight. The airline isn&#x27;t buying the fuel the day you buy your ticket or the day you fly, they&#x27;re buying the fuel the day they schedule the flight via futures (or if they aren&#x27;t ,they should be). It also isn&#x27;t something out of the ordinary in the day to day business. Here in Australia their is &#x27;public holiday surcharges&#x27; where you have to pay a surcharge on public holidays because businesses have to pay their employees more.<p>There should be requirements on what can be permitted to be placed as a &#x27;surcharge&#x27;. As I see it, there is nothing stopping an airline from doing a complete &#x27;a la carte&#x27; offering where every item of your ticket is broken out as a separate charge, but unfortunately, you don&#x27;t have the option to opt-out of any of it.
评论 #7168183 未加载
评论 #7168701 未加载
评论 #7168761 未加载
评论 #7169008 未加载
评论 #7168321 未加载
Titanous超过 11 年前
The DOT ruled[1] against AA and fined them a whole $60,000 after a complaint[2] from Edelman.<p>[1] <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=DOT-OST-2013-0024-0032" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.regulations.gov&#x2F;#!documentDetail;D=DOT-OST-2013-0...</a><p>[2] <a href="http://www.benedelman.org/airfare-advertising/americanairlines.html#complaint" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.benedelman.org&#x2F;airfare-advertising&#x2F;americanairlin...</a>
评论 #7167920 未加载
评论 #7168177 未加载
评论 #7168030 未加载
martingordon超过 11 年前
I first came across this when I tried to redeem some of my 100k miles I accumulated on British Airways from business travel (at the time AA&#x2F;BA didn&#x27;t give AAdvantage miles for transatlantic flights on BA).<p>Almost any time I try to book an award ticket, I&#x27;m hit with, for example, an $800 ticket that &quot;costs&quot; $250 with $550 in fuel surcharges. This results in award tickets that cost 50,000 miles + $550. Definitely not worth it and not what I was expecting when I signed up.
评论 #7168685 未加载
评论 #7168307 未加载
judk超过 11 年前
Ultimately, calling it &quot;tax&quot; isn&#x27;t really the problem.<p>Not including nationally standard costs in national advertising is the problem.