TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

CVS Caremark pharmacies to halt tobacco sales

23 点作者 kenshiro_o超过 11 年前

10 条评论

gatehouse超过 11 年前
One interesting thing I picked up from Damian McBride's political memoir was that the most progressive (in the taxation sense) change that they could make to the VAT would be to lower the taxes on cigarettes and alcohol.
onion2k超过 11 年前
Here in the UK the only shops that sell cigarettes are supermarkets and independent newsagents, and neither is allowed to have them on display - they&#x27;re on shelves behind the counter with shutters or curtains in front. Some bars have vending machines for them, but even that&#x27;s becoming quite uncommon. I imagine within a decade supermarkets will have stopped selling them altogether so the few remaining smokers will have to hunt out little backstreet shops that still stock them.<p>To learn that cigarettes are sold in <i>pharmacies</i> in the USA is frankly incredible.
评论 #7184824 未加载
评论 #7184936 未加载
评论 #7184836 未加载
评论 #7184955 未加载
评论 #7184896 未加载
评论 #7184847 未加载
tzs超过 11 年前
Good move for CVS. A rational clear case can be made that a pharmacy should not be selling products whose primary use is subversion of our health. The notion is in fact rather bazaar. It perforce sends a bad message when a store operating under the aegis of a state license to sell medicine sells something as bad for you as cigarettes.
jack-r-abbit超过 11 年前
While I applaud the stand they are taking against this killer product, it does seem a bit hypocritical that they will continue to sell junk food and liquor.
评论 #7184905 未加载
hairama超过 11 年前
This could mean that they&#x27;re moving the cigarettes from the pharmacy proper, to the regular retail area--with a healthy amount of spin.
评论 #7184997 未加载
评论 #7185065 未加载
评论 #7185017 未加载
christopheraden超过 11 年前
My first question was how CVS-Caremark, a publicly traded company would be allowed to do this, considering it would hurt their bottom line. I didn&#x27;t think ethics were a reasonable excuse for knowingly hampering profits, unless they felt there was some long-term benefit to their business of not selling cigarettes. Fiduciary duty trumps morals.<p>Does it have anything to do with the fact that CVS-Caremark is one of the largest PBMs in the US (second only to ExpressScripts, actually)?<p>There&#x27;s more at play here than just a moral action.
评论 #7184920 未加载
评论 #7185071 未加载
评论 #7184943 未加载
评论 #7184951 未加载
cma超过 11 年前
lifehacker.com to continue interspersing Gawker and Jezebel story links amongst treatises on focus and productivity.
评论 #7184799 未加载
taternuts超过 11 年前
probably because they are making enough money selling e-cigs to make up for it.
评论 #7184762 未加载
icantthinkofone超过 11 年前
In this day and age, I am continually astounded that people smoke and take up smoking.
评论 #7184745 未加载
评论 #7184781 未加载
评论 #7184753 未加载
评论 #7184835 未加载
评论 #7184723 未加载
评论 #7184826 未加载
评论 #7184853 未加载
a8da6b0c91d超过 11 年前
Tobacco does have some well documented medicinal qualities, believe it or not. There&#x27;s no shortage of things at CVS that can harm through abuse.
评论 #7184913 未加载
评论 #7184825 未加载