TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Open-Source Tools for Working With Video and Audio

28 点作者 newacc将近 16 年前

6 条评论

cesare将近 16 年前
I also suggest:<p>* Ardour (<a href="http://ardour.org/" rel="nofollow">http://ardour.org/</a>) - a digital audio workstation<p>* Cinelerra (<a href="http://cinelerra.org/" rel="nofollow">http://cinelerra.org/</a>) - for video editing<p>* Snd (<a href="http://ccrma.stanford.edu/software/snd/snd/snd.html" rel="nofollow">http://ccrma.stanford.edu/software/snd/snd/snd.html</a>) - a sound editor scriptable in scheme, ruby or forth.
评论 #719796 未加载
shin_lao将近 16 年前
I don't think the author tried to get any real work done with Audacity. It's really not up to par with either Sound Forge or Wavelab.<p>I really had a terrible time last time I checked out Audacity.<p>I understand it's free of charge and you can definitely get some work done with it (if you aren't in a hurry).<p>The thing is I just don't think open source is competitive in that kind of market.<p>First of all: very limited export and import. I like my audio editor to be a hub where I can switch from one format to the other.<p>UI : I really don't like the UI I'm sorry to say I find it very ugly. I also have the feeling it takes a significant higher number of operations to trim, zoom, detrim, cancel, copy, etc. Maybe with time I could cope with it if I didn't have the choice. Ah, wait, I have a choice. :) In Wavelab you have a virtual rack in which you can plug in the VST FX, and tweak it in real time. It's really well done and the visual feedback is very helpful.<p>Effects : it's just not delivered with decent effects (where is the multi-band compression?) and good VST effects (such as the Waves Diamond Bundle) are expensive (&#62; 3000 €). If you spend for 3000 € of FX, I guess you can spend another 400 € for an audio editor.<p>But the real show stopper was that Audacity doesn't support the audio output I need, that is ASIO. I need ASIO output to get the sub 40 ms output latency. I don't think it supports WASAPI either which would be a work around.<p>For home usage, Sound Forge Audio Studio is only 35 € and in my opinion much better than Audacity. You can burn you recording directly from the software, in Audacity you have to export to wav and then burn the track (unless it changed).<p>Hope this sheds some light.
评论 #719808 未加载
评论 #720211 未加载
mgk将近 16 年前
Shameless plug time.<p>www.celtx.com - Open source pre-production application for making films, stageplays, audio, AV and comics (so far).
评论 #720197 未加载
评论 #720009 未加载
enqk将近 16 年前
What a disappointing article!<p>Only four piece of software mentioned. Of the four, only Audacity and Blender are really about working with Video and Audio. The rest are a format transcoder (Simple Theora Encoder) and a general purpose media player and broadcaster (VLC)<p>So in summary, none none of them are really about editing video.<p>The article even failed to mention you can almost do that with Blender, but learning a complete and thus quite complicated 3d suite to edit your vacations' videos is a bit "much."
GvS将近 16 年前
MeGUI (<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/megui/" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/projects/megui/</a>) is my favourite.
pasbesoin将近 16 年前
I know nothing about this area, but Mums just asked me to help her and her business partner put together a DVD demonstrating their healthcare treatment techniques. They are "leading edge" in their field and need visual before and after documentation to convince others, particularly the mainstream medical community, that their results are real. To be clear, this isn't "crystal magnets and stuff"; it's advanced physical therapy and neuro-physiological techniques invoking neuro-plasticity and the like.<p>Nothing too fancy required of the video, except that faces need to be blurred. Does anyone know of an open source / low or zero cost editor that can do that reliably?<p>Once, some years in the past, she spent some thousands on a professionally produced videotape, but was underwhelmed with the results and a bit overwhelmed at the price tag given the relative simplicity of her editing needs (although I can see face blurring as a multi-hour "target shoot" kind of exercise, for the editor). Thus, this time her "computer literate" son has been drafted.<p>EDIT: She works a lot with disadvantaged children. Good work, but there's not tons of money in it. So, she's not just being cheap. And as I'm between jobs, I'm avoiding expenses, myself.
评论 #719640 未加载