The article title seems to confuse everybody, especially if you read the comments.<p>* Apple has 91% of _revenue_ when > $1000 is being spent
* They only have 7% of the market<p>The way I read this: there's a <i>ton</i> of cheap machines out there, and they ain't Macs. (Duh.)<p>Is it me, or does it seem like Microsoft is still not avoiding becoming the "budget" system? I can't see this working out in the long term, if they want to continue to avoid being a commodity. (You know, charging lots of $$ for upgrades.)<p>Something tells me the next year is going to be interesting.