Ridiculously misleading headline.<p>No, this is not what the court has said. In fact they pretty much explicitly said the opposite, i.e., in principle they are <i>not</i> liable.<p>The court has said that a supplier that clearly knows that it is supplying services to an illegal operation should stop supplying those services.<p>There's nothing wrong with that in principle, it is applied to all kinds of things. The problem comes when it is applied to alleged copyright infringement, and it becomes even more problematic when it's indirect, like with torrent indexing sites.<p>That is something that is very difficult to ascertain, and it should not be left up to ISP's, registrars, telco's and alike to decide whether or not copyright infringement is going on.