I think naming Trello is a dicey move. Trello is a great product. It's incredibly simple -- a huge asset for most users -- and very well implemented.<p>I spent about 60 seconds looking at your homepage. I didn't convert. Here's my impression:<p>You say it's like Trello. So I like that. And then I see a screen that is much more complicated. I glance at it. Then skip past. Ok, phases. Phaser. Ok. So it's like, a way to keep tasks separate without just using a separate task board. Ok.<p>Moving on, now there's "arcs"? I see what you did there, with "story arc" and all. But wait, now my super simple trello issues are grouped into phases and arcs? And if I use this as part of my bigger process, then my phases and arcs are split or spliced into my sprints. Also, there's already an agile term for what you're calling "arcs" -- epics.<p>But I don't give up. I want to get it. I go back up to the top screenshot. Ok, it's 3 lists, just like Trello. But wait. Why is the first column green? And why is the top option bold? Do you select it? And then it changes what happens in the other 2 columns? But that's not like trello at all. And it's also not intuitive I don't think. And one list is "arcs" but the other 2 are "phases"?<p>And what are the "This week: 18..."? Number of stories completed? created? Why do I need to see that on every single page?<p>Also, I skipped right over the Vim section. It seems pointless to me. That is solving a problem I do not have. But hey, I can see others may use it or it could even just be a bit of a gimmicky feature that does get it some attention.<p>Anyway, and more important than all that, congrats on shipping!