<i>Why are diamonds more expensive than water, when the latter is far more useful? Because there’s a lot of water in the world but very few diamonds.</i><p>Diamonds are actually a great metaphor for overpriced executive "talent". Why? First, diamonds are <i>not fucking rare</i>. The price has been heavily manipulated. In executives, the manipulation pertains to the closed social network of entrenched parasites who can get those jobs: a similar cartel over high-echelon relationships (and owed favors, and extortions). The scarcity is illusory; there are a hundred times more people who are competent to fill their shoes. Second, many diamonds are junk. Third, diamonds are not really natural. Diamonds from the earth must be carved into a man-made shape through technical means, and (anyway) artificial diamonds are often superior in quantity. Similarly, "executive talent" is an artificial artifact, not some genetically-ordained rarity. Fourth, there's a lot of negativity and violence, even, involved in keeping this phony scarcity intact.<p>I guess the major difference is that few diamonds have <i>negative</i> value, while most corporate executives do.<p>The greatest trick these assholes (the upper class) ever played on society is convincing us that we need them, and that they are somehow so special that having connections to their stupid little club should be the #1 dominating factor in who makes the most money, gets to make important decisions, and works in the highest-level jobs.