科技回声

It's "GrubHub", not GitHub.That reminds me <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typoglycemia" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typoglycemia</a>

For some reason I read "GitHub" and did a double take.

I'm wondering if these days "filing for IPO" is synonymous with "couldn't raise another large round." It seems so common for multi-billion dollar companies to do a huge private equity financing (+$100MM) to push off Sarbanes-Oxley a few more extra years.Twitter, Dropbox, Facebook, Uber, GitHub, Airbnb, and Square have all done this. Maybe Goldman Sachs wasn't hungry for this one?

I wonder how much of an advantage they have in the IPO process because Seamless is so popular on Wall Street (maybe #2 after Bloomberg?)

Can someone please explain the "GrubHub Seamless" name? It is, in my opinion, a horrible name (either separately is fine).Is it just the corporate name? Is it from a merger of two egos and neither would give? Or is it some regional thing ala Carls Jr. & Hardees?Those who use it, what do you call it?

I wouldn't be cynical if it were in fact Github.

It said GitHub originally right?

you're joking right?