TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

An attack on publisher freedom and the power abuse/misuse by npm Inc.

11 点作者 V1超过 11 年前

3 条评论

thatthatis超过 11 年前
You seriously cant see how having one thing named npm which manages JavaScript packages and a completely different thing named npmjs has the potential to confuse people? The standard format for googling a JavaScript library that might have other meanings is [libray]js.<p>You, the author of npmjs, created this problem four years ago by not exercising due concern for the namespace commons you were polluting and being lazy in not choosing a descriptive, unique name for your package. This situation is 100% your fault, and you should feel shame for what you did not indignation for someone else cleaning up your mess.<p>Open-npm-central. Npm-client-abracadabra. Pure-js-npm-client.<p>[domain]-[descriptor]-[giberish] is an easy algo to quicky name your stuff in a responsible way.
sircambridge超过 11 年前
Dude just change the name! Can you imagine if you uploaded an app to the apple App Store that contained &quot;Apple&quot; in the name? They&#x27;d insta-shut you down.
pvorb超过 11 年前
It really IS confusing. You should rename it and everybody would benefit from it.