TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Startup Fundraising Lessons For The 99%

79 点作者 cornish大约 11 年前

4 条评论

birken大约 11 年前
I think this is generally decent advice about the mechanics of fundraising if you aren&#x27;t an &quot;in-demand&quot; startup. However, this does gloss over the major fact that this is a bad situation to find yourself in, and you are much better off spending energy getting yourself into a good situation than you are swimming upstream in a bad one. And while I&#x27;m sure being in YC does help with fundraising (extra social proof), you certainly don&#x27;t need to be in YC to raise money successfully.<p>If you don&#x27;t think you will be good at fundraising (because you don&#x27;t know a lot of rich people, you are a first-timer, you aren&#x27;t good at pitching, etc), then you should be operating your business in a way where you don&#x27;t need to fundraise. Be incredibly incredibly lean, generate revenue from day 1, figure out how to incrementally achieve ambitious goals, etc. There are a lot more ways to run a successful business than there are to run a successful fundraising --- investors are all looking for the same thing, and they could all be wrong. But if you grow fast enough or make enough money they&#x27;ll come around.<p>There isn&#x27;t too much reason to get into more details because pg wrote the canonical piece on fundraising, which certainly applies to non-YC companies as well: <a href="http://paulgraham.com/fr.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;paulgraham.com&#x2F;fr.html</a><p>But generally, the premise of this whole article is flawed. Most startups fail. If you want to successfully raise money, you should be in the 1% (or 5% or 10%, but some suitably small number) of top startups. And if you aren&#x27;t, then you should be spending your time getting there instead of raising money.
评论 #7310562 未加载
评论 #7310265 未加载
larrys大约 11 年前
&quot;Create artificial urgency by compressing your meetings.&quot;<p>Urgency. Yes. The above stands out as being true from my experience in any type of negotiation at all. It&#x27;s the opposite of the &quot;time kills all deals&quot;. Every negotiation needs a deadline and a reason to get people off the fence and make a decision (either way). Don&#x27;t let things drag on. Don&#x27;t give people the impression that you will always be around.<p>Also, don&#x27;t do obvious telegraphs like &quot;I have the following days opening&quot; which essentially any person who takes meetings knows actually means &quot;I am always available&quot;.<p>&quot;Another cheap idea: Create a keyword campaign for the top investors on your list. Use their names as the keywords. They sure as hell Google themselves, and when they do, there you are.&quot;<p>My personal feeling is that this is a waste for several reasons. It obviously assumes that people will google themselves on a regular basis but also assumes they won&#x27;t feel they are being stalked by an investee as well. Not to mention the fact that it&#x27;s a little cliche, like the billboard that asks for a marriage proposal.
评论 #7309539 未加载
danial大约 11 年前
<i>Always say that you’re raising less than you actually want. If you want to raise $1 million, tell investors you’re raising $750,000. This tactic will come in handy when they ask you how much has already been committed. Always answer in percentages, not actual numbers.</i><p>Is this sound advice? Could someone explain the reasoning behind it?
评论 #7310548 未加载
评论 #7309463 未加载
评论 #7309369 未加载
评论 #7309541 未加载
cornish大约 11 年前
Honest question here: I&#x27;m the OP, but my original title was, Reaction to “Was YC Worth It” – Startup Fundraising Lessons for the 99%. Someone changed my title? Is that normal when YC is mentioned in the headline?
评论 #7310127 未加载
评论 #7313505 未加载
评论 #7310349 未加载