I don't see the point, they are charging to install software, is that upsetting? Is it the fact that it is free software they are charging for that is upsetting?<p>I can't see the standpoint of mozilla either, surely you can't be required to have permission to use a "brand name" just because you mention that you can install some software for a fee? EDIT: I <i>did</i> read mozillas terms, but still think it makes no sense.<p>If I set up a store selling computers, surely I can, without permission of software manufacturers, allow customers a choice of software and offer to purchase a license & preinstall the software for the customer?