It was a decent video, but I simply couldn't help but feel like screaming "Just say the words 'free software' and 'proprietary', for fuck's sake!"<p>It is truly aggravating to what lengths some people will go to avoid using these words, as if they are some deeply offensive racial slurs.<p>Especially considering they specifically mention Richard Stallman as the founder of it all, which is just a total slap in the face to his ideas.<p>"Predatory" is actually a relatively accurate term, but it's the first time I've seen it used. We've already agreed on the vernacular: <i>proprietary</i>.<p>Open source is a purely pragmatic issue and does not offer any moral and ethical guidelines concerning freedom in of itself. Something can still be open source yet proprietary (or "predatory") at the same time, as in Microsoft's shared source models, or GitHub's Atom editor.<p>I'm very disappointed. This video was basically explaining the concepts of free software throughout the whole time, but for some inexplicable reason chose to stay away from addressing the proper terminology. Is it because "open source" is more marketable? Some hipster herd mentality? A revulsion towards the FSF?<p>It would have been great if they contrasted "free" with "gratis", but alas. I guess at this point free software has been too deeply whitewashed. I wonder if RMS will repeat himself for the umpteenth time over this?<p>Could have been more, but hey, I guess it's better than nothing.