TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Incubators are Bullshit

185 点作者 cardmagic大约 11 年前

33 条评论

nemesisj大约 11 年前
I feel like any &quot;X is bullshit&quot; post that doesn&#x27;t start out with a definition of X or Y or Z is just a glorified troll. Half this thread is going to be people either identifying with or attacking the straw man that&#x27;s posed but isn&#x27;t really defined well.<p>Even among people who run accelerators, incubators, and other types of programs, there is a lot of debate over where the lines begin, end, etc.<p>Instead of saying &quot;incubators are bullshit&quot; why not just saying &quot;Doing bullshit is bullshit&quot; since that seems to be the actual point of this post. Don&#x27;t do unproductive stuff that doesn&#x27;t actually advance your startup. Great. That advice is just as appropriate for outside of incubator people as those within an incubator.<p>For example, while reading this article I just kept getting distracted from the actual main point - many incubators just provide low cost office space. Is that bullshit? Many incubators aren&#x27;t actually accelerators like the author seems to confuse the term with. Is that bullshit?<p>I remember reading an article from the New Yorker where they talked about making fun of wannabe authors who just sit around and do everything that authors are supposed to do except <i>write</i>. They called this &quot;writering&quot; and it seems like the author is trying to say the same thing about &quot;startuping&quot;. Good. But that problem will always exist, regardless of whatever incubator you&#x27;re in or not in.<p>So maybe we should focus on the actual problem instead of just blasting a straw man, hoping for clicks?
评论 #7378984 未加载
评论 #7379063 未加载
评论 #7379577 未加载
评论 #7380657 未加载
评论 #7380056 未加载
pg大约 11 年前
I don&#x27;t know about the others, but this is not a description of YC. The whole point of YC is to focus on real work. The first thing we tell the startups we accept is that they should build stuff and talk to users (and exercise and spend time with their families) and nothing else.<p>When the Airbnbs came to speak at the last dinner, Brian Chesky said that the 3 months of YC had been the most productive time in their lives.
评论 #7377676 未加载
评论 #7378639 未加载
评论 #7377696 未加载
评论 #7378011 未加载
评论 #7377744 未加载
评论 #7379708 未加载
评论 #7378074 未加载
评论 #7379234 未加载
评论 #7378257 未加载
djyaz1200大约 11 年前
Agreed. People with no clue how to create and scale a business have copied a formula developed by people who actually do understand this. This isn&#x27;t just not helpful, it&#x27;s actively harmful. By anointing themselves as the local &quot;conveyor belt&quot; for interesting companies and talented entrepreneurs incubators have created confusion in the market that harms perfectly good founders who do not participate. People say... &quot;you should apply for XYZ accelerator&quot; and my reply is... &quot;why?&quot; Is there any reason to other than that other people do? It has become a sort of tax or validation stamp that we are all expected to seek out... and after that go on Shark Tank?! Then at some point we get acquired by Yahoo?<p>Successful startup outcomes and solvency in the incubator world are not correlated well. The companies that are selected are carefully directed through a maze of expensive professional services controlled by the program directors. The bargain becomes... if you use this lawyer, this PR consultant and this accounting firm we will support you. What this means is that every failed startup isn&#x27;t really a failure because in the end that company spends all their money paying off the incubator&#x27;s network. It&#x27;s an engine of corruption that takes advantage of people and companies that can least afford it. Whether they create any real startup success is not especially relevant to their continued survival, it&#x27;s just a bonus.<p>Many incubator programs also tends to select for people who are very well behaved, polite and have simple A to B ideas. True disruptive innovation is usually created by disruptive people who have very big ideas.<p>I don&#x27;t think incubators really intend to hurt founders or the market, but they do.
评论 #7378493 未加载
评论 #7377802 未加载
borski大约 11 年前
This is not indicative, at least, of 500 Startups. Look, you can fuck up your time with any incubator by not focusing on things important to your startup. Dave McClure and the other partners there will yell at you for doing this, and the common theme is &quot;Get back to fucking work&quot; and &quot;Don&#x27;t waste your time with bullshit meetings.&quot;<p>The overall feeling is: build, get customers, experiment and verify, and build.<p>The problem is that most accelerators (500 included) have a TON of opportunity for distraction, and undisciplined founders get distracted. For us, 500 was immensely useful because it gave us a network of people to reach out to that didn&#x27;t exist in our world before 500. For finding customers, verifying assumptions, user testing, raising funding, and all that other stuff that startups have to do, this was incredibly important.<p>tl;dr: incubators are what you make of them. you can waste your time, or it can be the most productive time you&#x27;ll ever have, and it all depends on your discipline. you&#x27;ll have more opportunity than you would otherwise, but you have to be disciplined about what avenues you pursue and which you don&#x27;t. the same is true of college, incidentally.<p>EDIT: It&#x27;s important to note that I made this mistake freshman year at MIT, and learned from it. There was so much opportunity for learning, initially, that I squandered it and tried to do too much. I was incredibly busy, but never really got anything done. I learned to focus on what&#x27;s important, but the resources I had at MIT meant that focus was better utilized than it would have been at a smaller school with fewer opportunities. The same is true for incubators&#x2F;accelerators; we saw undisciplined founders have this problem, but we took full advantage of all the resources 500s gave us, and ignored the meetings&#x2F;events we didn&#x27;t care about and that weren&#x27;t useful to us.
midas007大约 11 年前
If you&#x27;re gonna start an incubator, you&#x27;ve got to have serious media creds, founder relationships, have other founders on-board and soft launch. Basically Om&#x27;s other possible career option.<p>It&#x27;s inevitable that folks would try to copy a model tactically without understanding the strategy. However I&#x27;ve seen European old money enchanted by people that are adept at playing the valley game. For example, one promising approach might be to solve some timely pain-points: what arent startups usually good at? global localized replication post-traction, customer service and backoffice. This is shit that usually gets built &quot;organically&quot; and falls (or fails) over, until real professionals are brought in to make it look more like a real business. That could work since it reduces risk on the investor side (by funding things later) at the risk of accepting higher valuations. They seem to have the ca$h but don&#x27;t know what else to do with it.<p>But coming at founders with only a wooly wish and demanding equity is only going to rope in people too desperate to know the difference. Wantrepreneur incubator : not gonna try to portmanteau that. Thankfully, there&#x27;s an app for that: <a href="http://portmanteaur.com/?words=Wantrepreneur+incubator" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;portmanteaur.com&#x2F;?words=Wantrepreneur+incubator</a>
king_magic大约 11 年前
I stopped reading, closed the page and never looked back as soon as the &quot;Are You a Craftsman Founder?&quot; popup blocked my view of the article.<p>Honestly, when will sites like this learn?
评论 #7380245 未加载
joshfraser大约 11 年前
I&#x27;m guessing everyone here knows Sendgrid and Digital Ocean. Both are TechStars companies that weren&#x27;t mentioned but are doing quite well.<p>Focus and learning how to say &quot;no&quot; is a critical skill for any founder to master, whether they&#x27;re a part of an incubator or not.
newhouseb大约 11 年前
&gt; We have not yet seen a single “incubated” startup go public yet.<p>Yelp was technically incubated by Max Levchin&#x27;s incubator (although I&#x27;m blanking on what they called it).
评论 #7377826 未加载
评论 #7377789 未加载
_kulte大约 11 年前
Uptime is bullshit... just kidding, I&#x27;m excited to read it eventually because I tend to agree.
评论 #7378502 未加载
billspreston大约 11 年前
Interesting post, but I would recommend not missing out on the birthing classes.
评论 #7386746 未加载
batoure大约 11 年前
Site seems to be responding with 503 here is the cache<p><a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:oL0JfmRMKPIJ:www.craftsmanfounder.com/incubators-are-bullshit/&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;strip=1" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;webcache.googleusercontent.com&#x2F;search?q=cache:oL0JfmR...</a>
morgante大约 11 年前
I feel like one of the reasons YC isn&#x27;t bullshit is that they do <i>less</i>. Companies don&#x27;t work out of YC, there isn&#x27;t the strange emphasis on &quot;networking&quot; that you see in most incubators. Put simply, by offering less shit they exclude opportunities for bullshit.
vyala大约 11 年前
I do personally analyzed 50+ companies in Indian startup scene who gone through incubators. Not many of them had success. I asked one of the founder of the company who had gone to MS Accelerator, he mentioned as 4 months of office space without rent.<p>I serious doubt mentor contribution in the startups. Every problem is unique, I exactly don&#x27;t know what mentors brings to the team and table in such a short meeting (1-2 hrs) on weekly basis.
评论 #7377510 未加载
评论 #7377549 未加载
评论 #7378254 未加载
rachellaw大约 11 年前
Carlson is looking at things from a very narrow perspective. If the industry has high barriers to entry, an incubator can help because it just gives that extra lead time you need to get a product to launch. Not all products are apps that you can churn out in the basement to profitability.<p>What if you have additional inventory? What if you need to purchase forwarding commodity price? What if your idea is simply new enough that you don&#x27;t have any precedents? Incubators can help with that, especially if they have a lawyer and accountant at hand.<p>There&#x27;s also a third factor, which is that if you&#x27;re an international&#x2F;immigrant or someone from a state unfamiliar with tech industry, then the connections are helpful. The idea of low fidelity networks being worse off is absolute bullshit though, it&#x27;s been proven over and over again that a large network of weak ties generates a stronger overall response than a small network of strong ties. Weak ties is what builds communities and gives people jobs (which tbh, is exactly what Linkedin managed to do so well technologically)
rdl大约 11 年前
From firsthand observation of YC since 2011, YC doesn&#x27;t suffer from most of the (legitimate) gripes you point out.<p>I also have a pretty high opinion of 500 Startups as an outsider. It seems like 500 goes for singles and doubles more than YC does, and ranges farther afield in trying to get new applicants from underserved areas (although YC has stepped up on this in the past 9 months). I don&#x27;t have as much data about 500 Startups, but I&#x27;d probably say it&#x27;s a net-accretive thing for participants and a solid #2.<p>Every other choice I would very closely judge before participating. The problem is most of the people entering are in the least capable position to judge the value of a specific program.<p>Apply to YC -- Summer 2014 apps close in a couple weeks.
mamcx大约 11 年前
Consider the state-of-art on my country:<p><a href="https://apps.co/inscripciones/convocatoria/ideacion-prototipaje-y-validacion-iteracion-vi-con/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;apps.co&#x2F;inscripciones&#x2F;convocatoria&#x2F;ideacion-prototip...</a><p>To be there, the contract say the founder MUST spend 50%&#x2F;week of the time in the incubator (hearing lectures, have somebody tell him how make a business plan, &quot;networking&quot;, etc).<p>I have been there, and get out. I have talked with the people that manage that asking &quot;why not copy y-combinator&quot; (with specific points, btw). But the problem is that that &quot;50%&quot; is billable. The get money for each startup wasting time there...
janson0大约 11 年前
I think this article is really short-sighted, in that he is just making a blanket statement that doesn&#x27;t apply to all incubators and doesn&#x27;t apply to all companies.<p>We are applying for incubators now, because it will give us the opportunity to continue doing business and will help us grow our business. We think it will be a good fit, because we are heavy on the engineering side and are looking for some investors to get on board and back our passion with real dollars. Runway + opportunity to focus is the reason you want to get investment or into an incubator.<p>Anyway, nice work on getting people to your site through a clever title.
评论 #7377887 未加载
wise_young_man大约 11 年前
Craftsman founder reminds me of Ninja programmer and Rockstar developer.
评论 #7378163 未加载
pushkargaikwad大约 11 年前
Incubators are Bullshit, Startup Accelerators are Scams<p>Barring few in US and India, you can put the rest in the above two categories. Most of the people running these incubators&#x2F;accelerators are there for Kicks, Greed, Ego and Entertainment only and themselves don&#x27;t understand the challenges of building a business. Unfortunately most of the startup founders are too naive and in hyper state of mind so get sucked into these.
doczoidberg大约 11 年前
I think there are good and bad incubators. As a founder you always should _rate everything you do on facts_. Inform you about failure&#x2F;success ratio and asks former participants what they think about it. I for myself have never participated in an incubator because I want to focus on the product and customers first. But this is just my 2pence.
seanccox大约 11 年前
Your excerpt from the manifesto raises an interesting point, about &quot;deadly&quot; consequences of mistaking ambition for greed. At the same time, you call out specific people and imply they killed themselves because of their own greed.<p>Can you clarify whether you actually know that, or is that just, like, your opinion, man?
andrewflnr大约 11 年前
Working from the general atmosphere of bandied-about numbers, I think &quot;big startup successes&quot; are closer to 1 in 100 than 1 in 10, if not 1 in 1000. If YC is anywhere near 1 in 10, that is pretty amazing. At the same time, I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s fair to hold incubators to this 1 in 10 standard.
primitivesuave大约 11 年前
Here&#x27;s the Google cache for anyone who wants to read it:<p><a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:oL0JfmRMKPIJ:www.craftsmanfounder.com/incubators-are-bullshit/+&amp;cd=2&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=us" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;webcache.googleusercontent.com&#x2F;search?q=cache:oL0JfmR...</a>
评论 #7377570 未加载
vyala大约 11 年前
@cardmagic, let us know how much viewcount you had end the end of the day to crash the DB.
jbverschoor大约 11 年前
I&#x27;ve seen two incubators, and both were very much a waste. One of them had nice presentations &#x2F; talks, but that&#x27;s about it
jmpeax大约 11 年前
I don&#x27;t know what an incubator is, so I looked it up on Wikipedia where it says that &quot;Successful completion of a business incubation program increases the likelihood that a startup company will stay in business for the long term: older studies found 87% of incubator graduates stayed in business, in contrast to 44% of all firms.&quot;<p>I saw lots of &quot;bullshit&quot; words and other emotional words spewed around Carlson&#x27;s post, so I think I&#x27;ll go with the Wikipedia article on this one.
评论 #7377668 未加载
eru大约 11 年前
Interesting how YC is excluded from his comments.
评论 #7377579 未加载
评论 #7377568 未加载
angersock大约 11 年前
In a turn of events which should surprise no-one, the tech side of things destroyed the incubator.
unclebucknasty大约 11 年前
Or &quot;how I sell books by writing blog posts that make faux controversial statements&quot;.
dariusmonsef大约 11 年前
Good luck with your book.
grillermo大约 11 年前
And... its gone
canthonytucci大约 11 年前
visually offensive; didn&#x27;t read.
michaelochurch大约 11 年前
<i>If a company is in an incubator (except for YC), it is because they weren’t good enough companies to raise money the regular way. I have heard this from various industry veterans including VCs and angels. It is a stigma, not a badge of honor.</i><p>This is it. And what matters. The people I meet at incubators are, in general, not impressive. YC is somewhat of an exception. About half of YC founders impress me (some highly) and half are in that &quot;really?&quot; category. For other incubators, it&#x27;s closer to 10&#x2F;90. It&#x27;s not that they&#x27;re young and inexperienced; there are plenty of young people with potential whom I&#x27;d hire and mentor in a heartbeat. It&#x27;s the talent level. Most incubators have a &quot;no one good would be, or stay, here&quot; feel. They&#x27;re not the big leagues.<p>The &quot;cool&quot; startup scene is a halfway house for immature 22-32 year-olds that looks sorta like college, enough to prevent the reality shock of becoming an adult and having to show up somewhere in a single-digit morning hour.<p>At some point, you start to realize that you don&#x27;t give a shit about &quot;free dinner&quot; (you&#x27;d rather eat with family or friends) or nerf guns. What matters are personal success, interesting work, reputation and compensation. These are all highly correlated with joining a <i>good</i> company, not a &quot;fun&quot; one staffed and run by boys.