TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why Atom Can’t Replace Vim

5 点作者 bowyakka大约 11 年前

3 条评论

VeejayRampay大约 11 年前
I started using Atom at work recently (I&#x27;m a vim aficionado), there are things that I wish vim could do, but the lack of modes and the (as of now) limited capabilities of vim-mode still make me want to go back. It&#x27;s been the very same experience with previous editors like SublimeText or TextMate.<p>But I really wish someone could produce a modern (like Atom is modern) version of vim, I really do.
contulluipeste大约 11 年前
The composability of vi&#x2F;vim is not only its power, but its weakness. It&#x27;s like a non-redundant language in which (almost) everything can be validly interpreted leaving no room for error detection. In vim nearly everything can be interpreted as a command and executed (sometimes even without strong visual feedback to be noticed) which means a lot of rope for mistakes. And mistakes human do. And for (such imperfect) humans editors are.
013大约 11 年前
Did the end of that article just imply that we need a new text editor? A Vim cross Emacs cross (Atom|Sublime|NPP|Etc.) editor?