TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Nice $40M ecommerce company – call me when it scales

99 点作者 ski大约 11 年前

11 条评论

neotek大约 11 年前
Alternatively, you can base your business model on tricking people into subscribing to a service they likely don&#x27;t know they&#x27;re subscribing to.<p><a href="http://techcrunch.com/2013/09/27/not-so-vip/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;techcrunch.com&#x2F;2013&#x2F;09&#x2F;27&#x2F;not-so-vip&#x2F;</a>
评论 #7457118 未加载
Theodores大约 11 年前
$40 million is admirable. You could do that with a flat team where everyone knows everyone else and operate out the back of an established retail business.<p>Scaling that up would mean having three tiers of management, scores of interns, nobody knowing the names of anyone in the warehouse, the product team not talking to the customer care team, whole departments dealing with accounts things, it just goes on. You could have 100-250 extra people without noticing, banks to pay off, vast premises to rent, a huge marketing bill, considerable IT infrastructure and so on.<p>This would be fine if you really were that smart and that good. Why, you could be the next Amazon.com, even put them out of business. What is alarming is that people think that way, they let greed and arrogance cloud their judgement. It is like a disease.
评论 #7457407 未加载
评论 #7456507 未加载
ericcholis大约 11 年前
The re-engagement models listed seem glamorous and certainly are the current hot buzz. But, I doubt I&#x27;d call them sustainable. An established $40m company might try some of these, but should not rely on them as a core business model.<p>Incorporate flash sales as a daily deal feature, creating re-engagement and perhaps pushing lesser known or tough to sell products. I&#x27;d even argue that scarcity is good for a quick grab, but might be a turnoff for regular customers of a site that isn&#x27;t focused solely on flash sales.<p>Subscriptions are a slippery slope for physical goods as well. You have to be careful to provide the customer with enough perceived value, while enforcing the notion that the value will be the same every month. At the same time, you can&#x27;t strain your inventory or infrastructure to maintain the regular flow of these products.<p>Loyalty programs are probably the oldest, and safest trick in the book. Often times, can be done for free. Perhaps purchases earn points which are only redeemable on products you specify. Could help move problem inventory while saving a few points in payment processing fees.<p>One should tread carefully with all these options. Like the author mentions, there&#x27;s plenty of room for innovation in this space.<p>It&#x27;s possible that the $40m company is king of it&#x27;s niche hill. If that&#x27;s the case, they might look at leveraging their experience and infrastructure in other markets. All the while, working to keep the core business sustainable.
jmspring大约 11 年前
If I could have a $40m&#x2F;year business with happy employees, it sounds like a win to me. Figuring out some sort of profit sharing and adopting an internal culture of innovation to stay abreast of trends would make sense too.
lazyjones大约 11 年前
Plenty of people make a decent living off of such companies and so do their employees. Why would anyone call Josh Hannah though, unless they no longer wanted to run their company? Let him buy and sell his overvalued, short-lived bubbles (to other people like him who do likewise) and run your own, solid $40m companies for as long as you enjoy it...
allochthon大约 11 年前
I&#x27;m not that much of a fan of the VC infatuation with winning on a handful of &quot;unicorns&quot; and &quot;super-unicorns.&quot; Perhaps better for everyone (but the VCs) would be a healthy ecosystem of thousands of companies on the order of 10-50M dollars, and more financial support for getting to this &quot;stage.&quot; (I use quotes because I don&#x27;t think every company should aim to grow as big as Google or Facebook, or even Twitter or Github.)
评论 #7457019 未加载
BorisMelnik大约 11 年前
I don&#x27;t think anyone is really implying that having a $40 million company isn&#x27;t a good thing to have on your hands. The main idea of this article is the overall scalability of these types of companies from a VC &#x2F; enterprise point of view. $40 million is a lot to me, but pennies to others.<p>With competitors such as Amazon, 40 million in a lot of cases might be 10% or less of the marketshare. Or it is 100% of the market but it is tapped out.<p>Ecommerce is kind of a vast term. I think it is also important to look at if the company drop ships, has inventory, or manufacturers goods in-house. Huge difference there.
keltex大约 11 年前
I think the comparison with Overstock may be a bit flawed. The president of Overstock, Patrick Byrne, has been at war with Wall Street for a number of years. He blames them for naked short selling (an illegal practice of selling stock short that you haven&#x27;t borrowed) and is actually suing the &quot;prime brokers&quot; (the ones who handle most of the stock trades):<p><a href="http://www.overstock.com/Patrick-Byrne/7371/static.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.overstock.com&#x2F;Patrick-Byrne&#x2F;7371&#x2F;static.html</a><p>Thus overstock has been under attack by Wall Street and has an incredible high short interest. 20% of the stock is reported to be sold short, although Patrick thinks, with the unreported naked short selling, that the number is much higher:<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=OSTK" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;finance.yahoo.com&#x2F;q&#x2F;ks?s=OSTK</a>
评论 #7457996 未加载
Shinkei大约 11 年前
How many times can you denigrate Amazon in a single article? Articles don&#x27;t need to be written in such a sarcastic, negative tone to be informative. The style makes me distrust the author.
hownottowrite大约 11 年前
Suggested alternate title:<p>&quot;Nice $40M ecommerce company - call me when it scales and I can profit obscenely while strapping you with loads of debt and&#x2F;or other unwanted obligations&#x2F;management advice so that you end up firing half of your staff after doing the thing I made you do because I now control the board.&quot;<p>From the &quot;other&quot; Fab:<p><a href="http://betashop.com/post/72547337624/betashop-quarterly-volume-1-january-2014" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;betashop.com&#x2F;post&#x2F;72547337624&#x2F;betashop-quarterly-volu...</a><p><i>On a personal level I took some justifiable hits in 2013. That goes with the territory when you raise money at $1B and then cut headcount and operating expenses as dramatically and swiftly as I did. I freely admit, when you grow revenue 500% year over year and become a media darling overnight, it’s hard to keep perspective. No doubt, we had lost perspective at Fab. We had started to dream in billions when we should have been focused on making one day simply better than the one before it.</i>
untilHellbanned大约 11 年前
Great title. Terrible article.