TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

CEO Aaron Levie Will Only Own 4.1% Of Box When It IPOs, Investor DFJ Owns 25.5%

103 点作者 heidijavi大约 11 年前

14 条评论

nostrademons大约 11 年前
IIRC PayPal was very similar - it was sold for $1.5B, but Max Levchin&#x27;s share was only about $30M, and Elon Musk&#x27;s was only about $100M. By comparison, many early Web 2.0 darlings (Del.icio.us, Blogger, Flickr) sold for only $20-40M, but their founders had only taken small seed rounds, and so the vast majority of the purchase price went to the founders. 75% of a $40M acquisition = 3% of a $1B acquisition.<p>Something for founders to think about when they&#x27;re taking funding. If you look at the gigantic tech fortunes - Gates, Page&#x2F;Brin, Omidyar, Bezos, Zuckerburg, Hewlett&#x2F;Packard - they usually came from having a company that was already profitable or was already well down the hockey-stick user growth curve and had a clear path to monetization by the time they sought investment. Companies that fight tooth &amp; nail for customers and need lots of outside capital to do it usually have much worse financial outcomes.
评论 #7462334 未加载
评论 #7462594 未加载
评论 #7462783 未加载
评论 #7462609 未加载
pyrrhotech大约 11 年前
And the average engineer who thought they&#x27;d be rich, probably owns 0.0002%. Have fun with your 200k! Startups are such a scam for the employees.
评论 #7462510 未加载
评论 #7462468 未加载
评论 #7462704 未加载
评论 #7462504 未加载
评论 #7462677 未加载
评论 #7462650 未加载
评论 #7466878 未加载
评论 #7462457 未加载
fidotron大约 11 年前
This sets alarm bells off for me, of the kind saying the large investors are looking to claw as much back as possible via IPO because the core business isn&#x27;t as viable as they thought. Demonstrating profitable quarters in the run up to IPO is highly valuable, so if they aren&#x27;t doing that . . . yuck.<p>DropBox, for better or worse, appear to have cleaned up on the consumer front, and you&#x27;d have to be blind to not notice the trend these days is consumer tech getting into enterprise IT, and not vice versa. GDrive isn&#x27;t too hot, yet, but I&#x27;m sure they&#x27;ll eventually get there. Then MS probably have the biggest motivation to chase the enterprise market.<p>Sorry Box, I just don&#x27;t see this working out at all. Something smells bad.
评论 #7462706 未加载
klochner大约 11 年前
Not surprising given they raised 11 rounds, including series A-F, and have cumulatively raised over 400M
评论 #7463889 未加载
vqc大约 11 年前
Is it possible that he&#x27;s already cashed out some of his shares privately? (Get himself some liquidity prior to an exit.)
评论 #7462445 未加载
refurb大约 11 年前
Random question: When a company finally IPOs, how much equity are the top guys expected to hold onto?<p>I know it&#x27;s common for founders to be allowed to cash out some of their equity during financing rounds, usually enough to make them comfortable (a few million).<p>The reason I ask is if you&#x27;re Aaron Levie and Box IPOs, are you expected to not sell much of your remaining stake unless you leave the company? It just reminds me a little of the investment banks where partners understood that it was frowned upon if they sold their equity. Many of them lost everything when the banks collapsed (some would say rightfully so).
评论 #7463713 未加载
dasickis大约 11 年前
4% for a company like Box is pretty consistent (maybe slightly higher).<p><a href="http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2011/10/14/understanding-how-dilution-affects-you-at-a-startup/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bothsidesofthetable.com&#x2F;2011&#x2F;10&#x2F;14&#x2F;understanding-...</a>
cromwellian大约 11 年前
I view this as being smart. Box is under heavy competition not just from Dropbox, but from Google and Microsoft. 4% of $250 million is better than 50% of $0. The landscape is littered with founders who drank the koolaid and thought they were going to billions and ran their companies into the ground. Maybe Levie won&#x27;t own 50% of Box, but maybe he will own 4% of a viable company with a real business going forward. And if all else fails, he&#x27;ll walk away with $10 million.<p>That&#x27;s a &quot;problem&quot; I&#x27;m sure many of us would like to have.
评论 #7463476 未加载
ycmike大约 11 年前
I agree with the article that since startups are pass&#x2F;fail, the founders must due whatever they have to do to succeed. Marc Andreesen says to even take that highly diluted fourth round to get to product&#x2F;market fit and increase your chances of success. <a href="http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee204/ProductMarketFit.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.stanford.edu&#x2F;class&#x2F;ee204&#x2F;ProductMarketFit.html</a>
评论 #7462976 未加载
评论 #7462685 未加载
chrisgd大约 11 年前
He could have had more if he wanted to scale slower, but he wanted to get as big as possible as quick as possible.
bthomas大约 11 年前
How much does Mark Cuban have now? (350K as only Angel)
评论 #7462627 未加载
maaku大约 11 年前
Remind me again why entrepreneurs invite VC&#x27;s in?
michaelochurch大约 11 年前
&quot;If you have a gun, you can only rob a bank. If you have a bank, you can rob everyone.&quot;
jordhy大约 11 年前
He got totally Goxxed.