TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

CoreOS Update: btrfs, docker 0.9, add users, writable /etc, and more

79 点作者 chrisfarms大约 11 年前

5 条评论

tomgruner大约 11 年前
Docker, CoreOS, and the entire ecosystem are moving really fast, it is a bit hard for me as a developer to keep up. For some projects we are creating containers with Docker and will need to get some things into production as soon as Docker 1.0 is declared stable.<p>At the same time I want to switch to CoreOS, I also want to wait just a little while for blogs, tutorials, and tools to catch up to where CoreOS and Docker are at, and be usable in production by people who are not professional devops.<p>The most exciting thing for me in this post is CoreOS CloudInit. It seems to be one of those tools that a small shop could use. It looks a bit like the yaml for fig, but is something that could be used in production as well. At the moment, I have been trying to solve everything a bit on my own with Makefiles, which include Makefiles for custom variables and Makefiles for commands that can be run against each container. It is working great for dev, but I could never really see how to run the containers in prod. The Makefiles didn&#x27;t really seem like a prod solution, but CoreOS CloudInit looks like it could work.<p>We also skipped boot2docker and use vagrant with ssh, so seeing that there is a Vagrant box which will run just like an EC2 box is pretty exciting. I would be excited if Digital Ocean would start supporting CoreOS too.<p>[edit] Quite a few people would like CoreOS on Digital Ocean - <a href="http://digitalocean.uservoice.com/forums/136585-digital-ocean/suggestions/4250154-suport-coreos-as-a-deployment-platform" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;digitalocean.uservoice.com&#x2F;forums&#x2F;136585-digital-ocea...</a>
评论 #7482489 未加载
druiid大约 11 年前
Last I heard btrfs was still not considered a stable main production filesystem. Has this changed recently? Even just late last year I had not heard of production &#x27;success&#x27; stories on it.<p>Unless something has majorly changed, the idea of using btrfs for the main FS is a bit scary.
评论 #7481573 未加载
评论 #7482948 未加载
评论 #7482551 未加载
评论 #7482612 未加载
jaytaylor大约 11 年前
Do any of you know why btrfs is being pushed rather than [the more mature and super flexible] zfs?<p>There is lots of debate if you search google for comparisons, though they usually seem to end up favoring zfs, which is why I&#x27;m a little perplexed here.<p>e.g. <a href="http://rudd-o.com/linux-and-free-software/ways-in-which-zfs-is-better-than-btrfs" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;rudd-o.com&#x2F;linux-and-free-software&#x2F;ways-in-which-zfs-...</a><p>Notably, I also ran into a show-stopping kernel bug [0] with btrfs within a day or two of the first production rollout of ShipBuilder [1] (it&#x27;s an open-source self-hosted PaaS Heroku clone). Since switching to zfs there have been zero file-system related issues with any ShipBuilder production or staging environment so far as I am aware.<p>[0] <a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1214085" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bugs.launchpad.net&#x2F;ubuntu&#x2F;+source&#x2F;linux&#x2F;+bug&#x2F;1214085</a><p>[1] <a href="http://shipbuilder.io" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;shipbuilder.io</a>
评论 #7482600 未加载
评论 #7482687 未加载
评论 #7482777 未加载
yeukhon大约 11 年前
Any well-known companies actually using CoreOS?
r4um大约 11 年前
Anyone using this in production yet?
评论 #7481830 未加载
评论 #7483116 未加载
评论 #7482095 未加载