TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Experts Find Mt.Gox Only Lost 386 Bitcoins Due To Transaction Malleability

182 点作者 antonius大约 11 年前

11 条评论

olalonde大约 11 年前
The title is not accurate. Mt.Gox could have lost <i>at most</i> 386 BTC to transaction malleability. From the report&#x27;s conclusion: &quot; As such, barely 386 bitcoins could have been stolen using malleability attacks from MtGox or from other businesses.&quot;<p>In other words, the set of &quot;successful&quot; transaction malleability attacks totalled a sum of 386 BTC among which some may or may not have been targeted at Mt.Gox (impossible to know without knowing Mt.Gox addresses).
评论 #7484881 未加载
broolstoryco大约 11 年前
While very interesting, the scope of this study is limited by the fact that their data collection only goes back to January 2013, so anything that happened before that was not considered. I don&#x27;t want to defend Gox, but it is conceivable that they lost significant amounts of BTC prior to this via TM and were just doing business with a deficit of BTC.
评论 #7482968 未加载
评论 #7483111 未加载
评论 #7483258 未加载
评论 #7483054 未加载
devindotcom大约 11 年前
How easy&#x2F;difficult would it be to assemble and analyze the full set of transactions going back to mt gox&#x27;s start, assuming we know what we&#x27;re looking for and can just sift through looking for those, as the researchers did?
RV86大约 11 年前
It may be inconvenient to keep as much of your holdings in cold storage as possible, but it&#x27;s much more convenient than assuming the third party service you&#x27;re using is secure&#x2F;not a bad actor.
TaylorAlexander大约 11 年前
I don&#x27;t know much about this, but is it possible that Mt Gox simply stole the bitcoin themselves and blamed it on hackers? I imagine the coin is supposed to be cryptographically protected, but I don&#x27;t know where users stored their keys. Bitcoin is so new that we all seem to have bought the malleability loss claim, but it could have been a red herring. Disclaimer: That is all speculation, I know nothing about this.
评论 #7483211 未加载
评论 #7483239 未加载
cpncrunch大约 11 年前
This seems to suggest that if someone did a thorough audit of MtGox&#x27;s mess they might be able to figure out where these bitcoins went.
评论 #7483223 未加载
Zarathust大约 11 年前
While this doesn&#x27;t explain MtGox losses, this is still around 200k$ at today&#x27;s worth, enough to interest a lot of criminals
sciguy77大约 11 年前
How can I get in on the class action lawsuit?
评论 #7483129 未加载
评论 #7483019 未加载
评论 #7486412 未加载
评论 #7482818 未加载
jgalt212大约 11 年前
I know this sounds trollish, but why is the tech community so bullish on Bitcoin when theft seems so rampant&#x2F;easy?
userbinator大约 11 年前
386 - not a round number but a pretty recognisable one nonetheless.
评论 #7483033 未加载
评论 #7487769 未加载
评论 #7483711 未加载
pistle大约 11 年前
Experts? Conspiracy. Inside job... <i>sigh</i> Popcorn. Bored. Ambivalent. Shadenfreude. Apathy.