TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Cloud-Based Circuit Board Assembly

66 点作者 seddona大约 11 年前

9 条评论

cottonseed大约 11 年前
Based on my own design attempts, I think two things are holding back open source hardware design: (1) assembling and reflowing complex boards with parts in small, modern packages (0402 or 0201, QFN, fine-pitch BGAs) and (2) modern CAD features like length matching, differential-pair and multi routing and impedance matching: all the things you&#x27;d need to design a fast, wide DRAM interface, for example. (I know some off these features are available in free packages, but IMHO they&#x27;re just not there yet.) These would open up the kind of designs that are currently only available to elite designers with Altium, things like the RaspberryPi, BBB or bunnie&#x27;s Novena.<p>I built my own oven and had reasonable luck with two-sided boards with small packages (e.g. 0402) and large 1mm pitch BGAs, but I haven&#x27;t been able to consistently reflow QFNs. However, it is expensive, time consuming, not buying in bulk kills you, and for complex boards with expensive parts, yield becomes a significant cost factor. I&#x27;ll be interested to see what their costs are like. A service like this could be transformational.
评论 #7502564 未加载
评论 #7502567 未加载
评论 #7502432 未加载
评论 #7502444 未加载
sciguy77大约 11 年前
&gt; Using CircuitHub’s “Part Rank” the community decides which parts should be used. When all of the designers are using the same 10K resistor or Atmel chip, we can buy 10,000 of them instead of just 6 for your project alone.<p>YES! As someone who has bootstrap designed many PCB boards I am still skeptical about how cheap this will <i>actually</i> be, but I&#x27;m interested. I&#x27;ve generally kept costs around $100 per prototype board by using OSH Park to make the boards, Pololu for the stencil, and assembly by myself and a toaster oven. The downside of course is that this way takes more time and effort on my part. It would take a HUGE price drop to be cheaper than one night of my time + $100 + 2 week wait for PCBs though.
评论 #7504532 未加载
iandanforth大约 11 年前
I feel this kind of service is extraordinarily important. As a software person who&#x27;s gotten into hardware and robotics I am continually frustrated by the tyranny of choice in electronics. There are so many ways to accomplish a goal and it&#x27;s so expensive to do things <i>wrong</i> that a huge amount of my time is spent researching parts rather than building things out of those parts.<p>The more companies like this develop a clean pallet of available parts (even if the excuse is price control) the better! While I&#x27;m sure many people will be quick to point out that solid EE is hard for good reasons, I think we&#x27;re light-years from the point where we can say &quot;we can&#x27;t make useful prototyping any easier.&quot;<p>Perhaps this exists and I haven&#x27;t found it, but I&#x27;d love not to have to even think about parts and assembly. I want to write a clean high-level spec for the functions of a board and have part choice, fab, and assembly taken care of for me. I see services like this and ciruits.io as great stepping stones on the way to that goal.
评论 #7502503 未加载
评论 #7502589 未加载
pjc50大约 11 年前
&quot;Cloud based&quot; is a little misleading, but the service they&#x27;re offering is a very good idea. Batch PCB services have existed for a while and several have settled out as popular choices. Now the hacker &#x2F; small product dev community can have suitably downscaled assembly services too.<p>Hopefully the part standardisation will also include footprints for the PCB tools; setting that up is a common pain.
评论 #7502369 未加载
z3phyr大约 11 年前
Though not directly related, ideas like this will inevitibly lead to the mainstream robotics era. Even today, it is very hard to even &#x27;get&#x27; the right components for your design. If this works, then the &#x27;first entry&#x27; barrier to the field will be removed, and it will be easier for someone to work on the ZX or Apple II of the robots.
评论 #7502454 未加载
ErikRogneby大约 11 年前
This is great. I look forward to trying it out.<p>Does anyone know of a repository of open designs? Kind of like an <a href="http://www.thingiverse.com/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thingiverse.com&#x2F;</a> for PCBs?
评论 #7502632 未加载
LandoCalrissian大约 11 年前
This is one of the better ideas I have seen on here in a while. Definitely makes the hardware space far more approachable than in the past. I can&#x27;t wait to try it out!
评论 #7503514 未加载
chm大约 11 年前
Hey, if someone working for CircuitHub is here:<p>Your homepage [1] has a typo. Scaleable should read Scalable.<p>[1]:<a href="https://circuithub.com/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;circuithub.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #7504435 未加载
nnnnni大约 11 年前
Has anyone used this to make the board for a reprap?