TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Pavel Durov quits as VKontakte CEO

111 点作者 tolitius大约 11 年前

11 条评论

sillysaurus3大约 11 年前
This kind of thing seems to be one reason America is still the best place to start a business.<p>I&#x27;m saying that in order to spark a debate and challenge that belief. Would anyone please list some actions taken by the US government which is similar in nature to the takeover illustrated here?<p>It seems very similar to what happened in the middle ages. Before the rise of the merchant class, specifically the ability to defend themselves, bullies stepped in and took what they wanted. Pg went into some detail about that in one of his essays about wealth. The phrase &quot;if you let the nerds keep their lunch money, you rule the world&quot; comes to mind. Might that be changing? Is Russia harming itself by taking these actions? What ways might this action backfire against them? Or is this a new model for how governments should treat corporations that dare challenge their authority?<p>EDIT: I really didn&#x27;t mean to start a flamewar. My apologies. I was hoping to get people&#x27;s thoughts on whether governments of the future are going to do this kind of thing more and more (including the US). I should have led with that rather than cheerleading America.<p>EDIT2: I would again like to stress the international nature of this threat. This type of governmental action is something that seems likely to eventually threaten us all, regardless of where we&#x27;re located. As such, the best thing to do would be to discuss possible ways of protecting ourselves.<p>I would also like to apologize for accidentally insulting everyone who lives in places other than America. Phrasing my comment the way I did was a boneheaded thing to do. It currently reads like an elaborate form of trolling, as if I&#x27;m snubbing non-Americans. But in fact I&#x27;m just poor with the pen and in reality meant to debate the merits of starting companies in various countries, and to call attention to this international threat. I&#x27;m quite sorry for how it sounded. In the meantime, can anyone think of ways of protecting ourselves from centralized government action against businesses?
评论 #7510927 未加载
评论 #7510790 未加载
评论 #7511419 未加载
skolos大约 11 年前
In the early days of odnoklassniki and VKontakte there was a joke in Russia that KGB invented them as better version of its secret files on people. Now it does not look like a joke anymore.
评论 #7511046 未加载
aspidistra大约 11 年前
For UK readers and or football fans, the Alisher Usmanov mentioned, who now controls VKontakte, is the same Alisher Usmanov who owns a large stake in Arsenal FC.<p>He also owns a stake in Odnoklassniki, another Russian social media site, which is &quot;for classmates and old friends&quot;, a bit like Friends Reunited:<p><a href="http://odnoklassniki.ru/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;odnoklassniki.ru&#x2F;</a>
评论 #7512142 未加载
评论 #7511096 未加载
pgt大约 11 年前
For those who don&#x27;t know what VKontakte is (I didn&#x27;t), it is the biggest social network after Facebook with &quot;over 100 million active users&quot; according to vk.com, which they own.<p>More information: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VK_(social_network)" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;VK_(social_network)</a>
评论 #7510997 未加载
评论 #7511674 未加载
评论 #7512402 未加载
myth_drannon大约 11 年前
Utmost respect to Pavel for the courage. When NSA pushed the US companies they all, ALL CEOs just complied. Facebook,Google, Yahoo... all of them....
shmerl大约 11 年前
Does anyone still trust centralized social networks these days?
评论 #7511448 未加载
评论 #7512098 未加载
avodonosov大约 11 年前
The article tries to make out of thin air an impression that Kremlin took over VK by force, or something like that. Which is a complete bullshit IMHO.<p>Durov and others just exchanged their shares to cash, that&#x27;s all.<p>Trying to mention this together with the fact that Durov disobeyed traffic cop order and hit him with his car (he did, that&#x27;s a proven case, there is a video), doesn&#x27;t make it a &quot;Kremlin forceful takeover of VK&quot;
评论 #7512043 未加载
at-fates-hands大约 11 年前
This was in the related article that talked about how Putin muscled his way into the company before Durov sold off his shares:<p>&quot;It essentially means that there&#x27;s a glass ceiling to how big you can grow your company, and how influential your company can be in the Russian internet space before the government begins to take interest in it,&quot;<p><a href="http://www.theverge.com/2014/1/31/5363990/how-putins-cronies-seized-control-over-russias-facebook-pavel-durov-vk" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theverge.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;1&#x2F;31&#x2F;5363990&#x2F;how-putins-cronies...</a><p>Isn&#x27;t this how it&#x27;s always been in Russia?
评论 #7512105 未加载
huhtenberg大约 11 年前
This kinda puts Telegraph project in a different light, doesn&#x27;t it?
评论 #7511224 未加载
danabramov大约 11 年前
It was a joke.<p><a href="https://vk.com/durov?w=wall1_45618" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;vk.com&#x2F;durov?w=wall1_45618</a>
jedmeyers大约 11 年前
Did someone consider the fact that this might be an April 1st joke?
评论 #7511038 未加载
评论 #7523292 未加载
评论 #7550919 未加载