TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why we're updating the default typography for Wikipedia

17 点作者 arvinjoar大约 11 年前

5 条评论

saurik大约 11 年前
By using serif fonts for headings and sans-serif fonts for bodies they have broken the page alignment: the serifs push the headings over by enough pixels to be really noticeable; this kind of design requires really careful attention to optical margin layout (which is, of course, really problematic in CSS).
swalling大约 11 年前
If this is interesting, you might also like to read the longer post by Wikimedia&#x27;s Director of UX about the change. <a href="https://medium.com/p/1724cb2b7402" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;medium.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;1724cb2b7402</a>
devindotcom大约 11 年前
I thought I was crazy when I popped in to check something earlier. Bolds look a bit lopsided, especially at small sizes. But it&#x27;s probably a positive change overall.
rplst8大约 11 年前
The bolded fonts look nasty in Chrome on Windows.
评论 #7532684 未加载
WWLink大约 11 年前
Typeface hipsters?
评论 #7528231 未加载