TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Chrome is blocking wired.com

75 点作者 hammerbrostime大约 11 年前

33 条评论

Matt_Cutts大约 11 年前
Often when this happens with a large site, it&#x27;s because of an malware-laden ad. Typically with a smaller site, it&#x27;s because the site was somehow hacked or didn&#x27;t stay fully up-to-date on security patches.<p>Added: Looks like it was an actual hack, not just a bad ad. The Wired folks will want to make sure there&#x27;s no more iframes from hxxp:&#x2F;&#x2F;zlu bob.org. Folks can use our free Fetch as Google tool to see what we see when we try to fetch a page. You can find out more about the Fetch as Google tool here: <a href="https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/158587?hl=en" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.google.com&#x2F;webmasters&#x2F;answer&#x2F;158587?hl=en</a>
dpcan大约 11 年前
This happens to many small business sites.<p>If they leave their WordPress un-patched, or have a crappy plugin installed with security holes, or their FTP info is guessed, etc, hackers drop some malicious Javascript on their sites, and the next thing you know, their site cannot be accessed in Chrome, and usually Firefox as well. Depending on what services pick-up on the bad javascript.<p>For me, it usually takes a day(ish) from the time we are notified of the issue, update the sites, remove the malware, install webmaster tools from Google, submit and wait for the review to be unblocked.<p>On one hand, this is very frustrating, but on the other hand, many small businesses would have no idea their site had been hacked without it being blocked.<p>The only thing I&#x27;d like to see personally is if Google were somehow able to notify the domain registrant of the block via email so they find out right away, and not after a few weeks (or longer) in some cases. Some small business owners don&#x27;t check their sites very often. We like to monitor our client sites, but sometimes new clients come to us with these problems and have no idea how long they&#x27;ve been down.
评论 #7537899 未加载
jimhefferon大约 11 年前
Blocked for me, Ubuntu 13.10, Firefox 28.0.<p>The main page is not blocked but anything I click on is blocked.<p>Here is the Why page:<p>Safe Browsing Diagnostic page for wired.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;04<p>What is the current listing status for wired.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;04?<p><pre><code> Site is listed as suspicious - visiting this web site may harm your computer. </code></pre> What happened when Google visited this site?<p><pre><code> Of the 135 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 0 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2014-04-05, and suspicious content was never found on this site within the past 90 days. This site was hosted on 12 network(s) including AS31377 (AKAMAI-BOS), AS701 (UUNET), AS12989 (HWNG). </code></pre> Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware?<p><pre><code> Over the past 90 days, wired.com&#x2F;2014&#x2F;04 did not appear to function as an intermediary for the infection of any sites. </code></pre> Has this site hosted malware?<p><pre><code> No, this site has not hosted malicious software over the past 90 days. </code></pre> How did this happen?<p><pre><code> In some cases, third parties can add malicious code to legitimate sites, which would cause us to show the warning message. </code></pre> Next steps:<p><pre><code> Return to the previous page. If you are the owner of this web site, you can request a review of your site using Google Webmaster Tools. More information about the review process is available in Google&#x27;s Webmaster Help Center.</code></pre>
评论 #7537760 未加载
tijs大约 11 年前
They had a &#x27;technical issue&#x27; earlier today it seems:<p>&quot;WIRED: @Freakonomicss @hoffin205 Yeah, we had a technical issue this morning, but our tech team fixed. Waiting for @googlechrome to clear us&quot;<p><a href="https://twitter.com/wired/status/452490353283588096" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;wired&#x2F;status&#x2F;452490353283588096</a>
lukeschlather大约 11 年前
Weird: <a href="http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wired.com%2Fplaybook%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F07%2Fsurf-shaper-w.jpg&amp;client=chromium&amp;hl=en-US" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;safebrowsing.clients.google.com&#x2F;safebrowsing&#x2F;diagnost...</a><p>The page essentially says &quot;We believe this page is suspicious, and we have no evidence to back up that claim.&quot;<p>EDIT: They must have updated it&#x2F; busted a cache. The page is now reporting some evidence.
评论 #7537713 未加载
评论 #7537830 未加载
marcusr大约 11 年前
It&#x27;s blocking in Safari too so I think it&#x27;s a MacOS diagnosis rather than a Chrome one perhaps? Or both browsers are detecting the same thing
评论 #7537741 未加载
评论 #7537746 未加载
bunni大约 11 年前
This is almost always due to a malicious ad.
jw2013大约 11 年前
The message I got when I proceed is:<p>------- The website at www.wired.com contains elements from sites which appear to host malware – software that can hurt your computer or otherwise operate without your consent. Just visiting a site that contains malware can infect your computer.<p>Below is a list of all the unsafe elements for the page. Click on the Diagnostic link for more information on the thread for a specific element.<p>Malware <a href="http://www.wired.com/playbook/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/soccer_w.jpg" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;playbook&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2013&#x2F;07&#x2F;soc...</a> Safe Browsing diagnostic page<p>Malware <a href="http://www.wired.com/playbook/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/bike-press-w.jpg" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;playbook&#x2F;wp-content&#x2F;uploads&#x2F;2013&#x2F;06&#x2F;bik...</a> Safe Browsing diagnostic page -------<p>I wonder what&#x27;s wrong with these two pictures?
评论 #7537718 未加载
评论 #7537787 未加载
jcrites大约 11 年前
I can reproduce on Chrome 33.0.1750.154 m on Windows 8. Screenshot: <a href="http://imgur.com/cUEZJYe" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;imgur.com&#x2F;cUEZJYe</a><p>The safe browsing diagnostic page shows no negative current or previous reports for wired.com despite describing it as suspicious:<p><a href="http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wired.com&amp;client=googlechrome&amp;hl=en-US" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;safebrowsing.clients.google.com&#x2F;safebrowsing&#x2F;diagnost...</a><p>&gt; What is the current listing status for www.wired.com? This site is not currently listed as suspicious.<p>&gt; Has this site hosted malware? No, this site has not hosted malicious software over the past 90 days.
aslewofmice大约 11 年前
Any chance it&#x27;s related to this?<p><a href="http://www.incapsula.com/blog/world-largest-site-xss-ddos-zombies.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.incapsula.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;world-largest-site-xss-ddos-zo...</a><p>Security company found a vulnerable Alexa Top 50 site where someone was able to inject XSS code in the comments section creating &quot;DDoS Zombies&quot; of the visitors.
btian大约 11 年前
Safari and Firefox are also blocking Wired.
评论 #7537836 未加载
leephillips大约 11 年前
I just tried to go there using Chrome on Ubuntu and I got a malware warning: &quot;Content from www.wired.com, a known malware distributor, has been inserted into this web page. Visiting this page now is very likely to infect your computer with malware.&quot;
podperson大约 11 年前
Safari also -- not the home page but the articles. Showing up as phishing attack.
JohnTHaller大约 11 年前
Sucuri shows wired.com as clean on all lists and not blocked by anyone: <a href="http://sitecheck3.sucuri.net/results/wired.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;sitecheck3.sucuri.net&#x2F;results&#x2F;wired.com</a>
bingofuel大约 11 年前
Not on OSX (33.0.1750.152)
评论 #7537712 未加载
评论 #7537693 未加载
kanche大约 11 年前
In my laptop (Win 7, Dell 1555):<p>Blocked in Chrome Version 33.0.1750.154 m<p>Not blocked in ie11, Firefox 20<p>In my Mobile (HTC One M7 4.4.2):<p>Neither blocked in Chrome(33.1) nor in the stock browser<p>Doesn&#x27;t Android Chrome support malware detection?
sgy大约 11 年前
They had some technical issue this morning, but it&#x27;s supposedly fixed now. And they&#x27;re just waiting for Chrome to unflag them.
AzAngel大约 11 年前
The &quot;more about&quot; link shows that there are no malicious codes detected, etc. Maybe someone is sending false warnings?
Jamie452大约 11 年前
I&#x27;m a little confused how a webpage can infect a machine with malware?<p>Is this typically through Java Applets&#x2F;other plugins?
评论 #7537775 未加载
评论 #7537766 未加载
评论 #7537719 未加载
评论 #7537725 未加载
MatthewWilkes大约 11 年前
Works fine for me, Chrome 33.0.1750.152 on OSX
kunjanshah大约 11 年前
Does block for me OSX Version 33.0.1750.152
评论 #7537698 未加载
cdransf大约 11 年前
Not on iOS in either Chrome or Safari.
pit大约 11 年前
Definitely on Chromium 33.0.1750.152.
评论 #7537736 未加载
sgy大约 11 年前
The block is lifted now. Supposedly.
mherrmann大约 11 年前
Not in Android (?) Nexus 5.
randunel大约 11 年前
Works ok on ubuntu..
1337biz大约 11 年前
Oh, and I was thinking Google were just disagreeing with somebody in Wired&#x27;s management on some personal viewpoint. Silly me!
platinumdragon大约 11 年前
Not on Chrome for Android. Yes on Chrome for Windows. However, it&#x27;s been years since wired.com has been relevant, so it won&#x27;t be missed.
Istof大约 11 年前
I always thought that using the safe browsing feature is asking for trouble so it is disabled in all my browsers. So my browser doesn&#x27;t need to make an extra request to Mozilla&#x2F;Google&#x2F;etc every time I load a new website and the web is not censored if there is a technical issue
评论 #7537917 未加载
评论 #7537948 未加载
tensenki大约 11 年前
So when does robot slander&#x2F;libel suits begin? I&#x27;d be mighty ticked if google started labelling my sites as malware when they&#x27;re clearly not.
评论 #7537832 未加载
评论 #7537858 未加载
评论 #7537860 未加载
drvortex大约 11 年前
I am surprised why anyone is still using Chrome. Their debacle with remotely disabling extensions that are not from the Web Store should have spooked users enough.
pearjuice大约 11 年前
I can&#x27;t believe on HN of all places people are using Chrome its malware-detecting-capabilities. Friendly reminder that EVERY REQUEST you make with it enabled, will be passed through Google its filters.<p>You should turn all Google networking activities in your browser off. By default, there are at least five or so enabled which will happily send every request you make to Google. Some services even go as far as logging every keystroke you make.
评论 #7537961 未加载
评论 #7537876 未加载
评论 #7537920 未加载
评论 #7537933 未加载
评论 #7537856 未加载
sixothree大约 11 年前
I&#x27;ve stopped using chrome for general browsing since this latest scandal.