TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Surviving the post-employment economy

26 点作者 jal278大约 11 年前

6 条评论

mark_l_watson大约 11 年前
Great article, and a topic much discussed in my family and friends social group. The situation will get worse, with some of us having it easy while more and more people are falling through the cracks.<p>For the shamefull people who have little empathy for people who more of less have done the right things in their lives but struggle anyway, I say to you: congratulations for becoming corporate shills or shills for the elite.<p>I especially liked the last paragraph in the article about lending a hand.
评论 #7550561 未加载
9999大约 11 年前
The article claims 9% of CS majors are unemployed, but the article they reference (<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2013/07/30/tech-job-unemployment/2595669/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.usatoday.com&#x2F;story&#x2F;money&#x2F;personalfinance&#x2F;2013&#x2F;07&#x2F;...</a>) actually states that 9% of recently graduated CS majors are unemployed. The USA Today article referred to was written in July and does not specify what they mean by &quot;recently graduated.&quot; In any case, amazingly bad fact checking on the part of Al Jazeera.
jal278大约 11 年前
Explanation and analysis of the idea of a &#x27;post-employment economy&#x27;, i.e. increasing corporate profits and decreasing employment, is given in &#x27;The Lights in the Tunnel&#x27; by Martin Ford (which I found to be a good read, although a little verbose).<p>The main argument is that cheap computerized automation is displacing human workers, and corporate incentives are such that the trend is likely to continue. The long-term problem is that if systemic unemployment grows then the economy as a whole starts to flag b&#x2F;c consumers no longer have the funds to drive the consumer economy.<p>His solution is rethinking corporate tax (reducing&#x2F;eliminating pay-roll taxes which discentivize hiring, and potentially increasing corporate revenue tax). If displacement becomes extreme, he suggests that corporate taxes could fund a basic income for displaced workers to prop up the consumer economy.
评论 #7550041 未加载
fredgrott大约 11 年前
Its missing some stuff..<p>Put it this way, the money taken out of the system when mortgages blew up did not just accumulate over night. But its the multiplying effect that is the Big thing that was taken away...that multiplying effect did in fact trickle down to USA job growth for the middle class.<p>Now we do not have it..<p>Its different than other economy transitions, in other transitions for example from farm to industrial you had higher industrial wage jobs spurring young farmers to move to the city to work. Now we have what?<p>We may be looking at a 0-n problem being solved in that does a &#x27;StatUp&#x27; economy get established..<p>Other&#x27;s thoughts?
cmollis大约 11 年前
The one saving grace about automation is that there Is rarely enough time to automate everything. The automation software will need to be tweaked to manage the infinite variability of the future.<p>I think getting rid of, or reducing payroll, tax is a good idea in the medium term though.
ck425大约 11 年前
I don&#x27;t know a single computer scientist struggling for work. Infact the opposite it true.
评论 #7549738 未加载
评论 #7549676 未加载
评论 #7549802 未加载
评论 #7549750 未加载
评论 #7549962 未加载
评论 #7549650 未加载
评论 #7549715 未加载
评论 #7549788 未加载
评论 #7549947 未加载