TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Art of Contributing

10 点作者 vanstee大约 11 年前

2 条评论

zackmorris大约 11 年前
I&#x27;ve often thought that contributing to open source projects is too labor-intensive. Installing the version control system, configuring your environment to run the code, learning the code, updating the code, submitting the patch and then asking the maintainer(s) to merge the change all present barriers to entry.<p>What I would prefer is something akin to development currency, that would lower the bar and flatten the learning curve. I think that users want to be able to:<p>* Suggest a change<p>* Point to the problem code, if desired<p>* Suggest a fix, if desired<p>* Contribute in some way (perhaps monetarily) that helps the change occur, if desired<p>I wish that github had a bounty system like the one in Stack Overflow:<p><a href="http://www.quora.com/GitHub/Why-doesnt-Github-add-a-bounty-feature-so-that-people-could-conveniently-pay-for-issues-to-get-fixed" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quora.com&#x2F;GitHub&#x2F;Why-doesnt-Github-add-a-bounty-f...</a><p>If a system like this existed, I could easily see developers earning income on the side by improving code. It could incorporate something like Flattr so that developers could join a guild for some amount of money per month and vote for enhancements with their dollars&#x2F;bitcoins. It would be nice to withdraw karma as currency also.
评论 #7599891 未加载
just3ws大约 11 年前
The point made about &quot;bias towards merging&quot; is my favorite. It&#x27;s hard enough to get people to contribute without compounding the problem by kicking back their work over minutiae.