TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Longaccess Wants To Cold-Store Your Digital Life For 30 Years

16 点作者 comzeradd大约 11 年前

6 条评论

drdaeman大约 11 年前
100GB for 30 years? Well, I&#x27;m not sure about average cases, but personally I have collected a stack of about a dozen of hard drives (volume ranging from 60GB to 2TB) over last 15 years. All fully loaded with the digital junk - because why delete things when you can just leave them?<p>Most of the data in that digital fossils is movies from that bay with pirates, but I guess there&#x27;s still much more than 100GB of self-produced information - message (email, IM, phone) archives, digitized drawings, RAW photos, source code, savegames and so on.<p>Obviously, one could sort out the trash and compact the rest (like extracting a 10KB patch from several-gigabyte OpenWRT source tree, or radically compacting photo collection by deleting bad shots) and fit into 3GB&#x2F;yr quota, but that&#x27;s a hard and - unless one really wishes to fit some storage quota instead of just buying another hard drive - mostly pointless work.
评论 #7604552 未加载
Cthulhu_大约 11 年前
The main concern I have with services like these is: will they, their hosting, and thus my data, still be available in 30 years? I can just imagine that within 5 years, the service will go &quot;Okay we&#x27;re bankrupt, sorry, you&#x27;ve got one week to get your data before we pull the plug&quot;.<p>I&#x27;d rather see a service where you can upload your data, and it&#x27;ll send you back a physical data container where your data is written on a medium that is guaranteed to last the ages - i.e. no magnetic or optical (think dvd &#x2F; blu-ray) storage, but more of a stable solid-state or holographic storage. In a box that can be put in a safe for posterity to discover after 30 years.
评论 #7603131 未加载
ghshephard大约 11 年前
I think it&#x27;s great to have online long term storage, but, I&#x27;m a strong believer in also having an <i>offline</i> storage, particularly one that you physically control.<p>You can get a 3 Pack of 25 GB archival Blue-Ray discs for $15. So, for $30 you have 150 GB of truly &quot;cold&#x2F;offline&quot; data that should last significantly longer than 30 years. Toss that in a box somewhere to go hand-in-hand with the LongAccess&#x2F;AmazonGlacier storage...
评论 #7603059 未加载
zaroth大约 11 年前
100GB for 30 years - €399 (~$550) on Longaccess vs $360 (plus retrieval cost) on Glacier.<p>Who would you trust?
评论 #7602847 未加载
评论 #7602843 未加载
ljosa大约 11 年前
This would be more comforting if the data bailment were accompanies by some kind of insurament policy. Then, the stored data would be a valuable asset that could be sold to a new caretaker when Longaccess goes belly up.
评论 #7605748 未加载
fragkakis大约 11 年前
Great idea.