TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Update on Linksys WRT1900AC support for OpenWRT

136 点作者 atriix大约 11 年前

9 条评论

IgorPartola大约 11 年前
Personally, I now only buy and recommend routers that are supported by OpenWRT even if the end user does not end up using it. Usually such support means that the device is fairly open and uses fairly standard hardware. Something new and esoteric is likely to be more buggy. OpenWRT is also a great OS. If your router supports it, please give it a try, for security's sake.
评论 #7614293 未加载
评论 #7614800 未加载
评论 #7613609 未加载
评论 #7616038 未加载
paulgerhardt大约 11 年前
Our startup has tried both the Asus RT68-U and the Netgear N7000 (the two top of the line, AC1900 class, consumer routers on Small Network Builder[1]) for both office and factory operations with both stock and DD-WRT[2] firmwares.<p>Our initial preference was to lean towards the Asus given their track record on OpenWRT for the past few years. If your last experience with flashing a router&#x27;s firmware was with the Linksys WRT-54G back in 2004 than you may have missed out on all the Asus development that happened in the past decade.<p>We found the Netgear N7000 performed better overall. We were reluctant to use it as it did not support Dual-WAN mode initially like the Asus on stock firmware. (I.e. primary Comcast internet, secondary Verizon MiFi usb adapter.)<p>We recently updated both routers to [Kong]&#x27;s firmware mod of DD-WRT[3] and now the Netgear N7000 blows everything out of the water.<p>At our factory we are concurrently connecting 50 previously unassociated WiFi devices every 30 seconds and the dual-core 1Ghz Netgear just keeps on trucking with no problems. Our Asus meanwhile will crash about once a day.<p>Going forward we will stick with the Netgear. It seems to have become the &#x27;default&#x27; router on the DD-WRT community, with support for other routers being forks off the N7000 code. Given Linksys has long no longer been &#x27;Linksys&#x27; been &#x27;Cisco&#x27; been &#x27;Belkin&#x27; been Marvell, I don&#x27;t anticipate it superseding the thrown despite the <i>classic</i> throwback black and blue livery. The 1.2Ghz processor and quad-band antenna is nothing to snub at. Should be an interesting year for router enthusiasts.<p>[1]<a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-reviews/32239-ac1900-first-look-netgear-r7000-a-asus-rt-ac68u" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.smallnetbuilder.com&#x2F;wireless&#x2F;wireless-reviews&#x2F;322...</a><p>[2]In broad strokes, DD-WRT is like a nice, easy to install, easy to configure version of OpenWRT. If you previously preferred using Tomato to OpenWRT this is for you. OpenWRT is when you really want ring-zero console access only with no amenities out of the gate.<p>[3]<a href="http://tips.desipro.de/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;tips.desipro.de&#x2F;</a> - [Kong] made some modifications to DD-WRT to work better with the new AC-1900 class routers. They are fast becoming the master branch.
评论 #7615184 未加载
zokier大约 11 年前
Here are the patches (and discussion) mentioned<p><a href="https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2014-April/024589.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lists.openwrt.org&#x2F;pipermail&#x2F;openwrt-devel&#x2F;2014-April...</a><p><a href="https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2014-April/024703.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lists.openwrt.org&#x2F;pipermail&#x2F;openwrt-devel&#x2F;2014-April...</a><p><a href="https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2014-April/024837.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lists.openwrt.org&#x2F;pipermail&#x2F;openwrt-devel&#x2F;2014-April...</a>
评论 #7614117 未加载
TehCorwiz大约 11 年前
Linksys (cisco) dropped the ball a long time ago. I&#x27;ve moved on an have been using Ubiquiti stuff for years. Their router even runs Debian.
评论 #7614047 未加载
评论 #7614060 未加载
ram_rattle大约 11 年前
Tplink MR3020 is the cheapest in India, do try it you can create lot of application with this router
评论 #7613662 未加载
Omniusaspirer大约 11 年前
Knowing this, can anyone enlighten me on why you&#x27;d buy this router over the Netgear R7000? It seems to be a worse router from the reviews I&#x27;ve seen, albeit with better storage performance.<p><a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-reviews/32393-linksys-wrt1900ac-ac1900-dual-band-wireless-router-review?showall=&amp;start=5" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.smallnetbuilder.com&#x2F;wireless&#x2F;wireless-reviews&#x2F;323...</a>
评论 #7613683 未加载
buzzkills大约 11 年前
It still appears in their list of supported hardware though. <a href="http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/start" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.openwrt.org&#x2F;toh&#x2F;start</a> of course when you dig deeper it is clear it doesn&#x27;t work but still should it be in one of the other tables showing support in progress
dfa0大约 11 年前
Wow, this costs more than a Chromebook!
评论 #7613704 未加载
评论 #7613576 未加载
13throwaway大约 11 年前
ELI5 why companies don&#x27;t open source drivers. The hardware is proprietary so what do they have to lose?
评论 #7613953 未加载
评论 #7613608 未加载