TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Show HN: Usetrace – Virtual users doing your repetitive web testing

43 点作者 dhpe大约 11 年前

9 条评论

jvandyke大约 11 年前
Great start to a great product.<p>We have an Angular app w&#x2F; OAuth flows and connections to outside apps. We started with Protractor running locally and on SauceLabs, but it hasn&#x27;t seen much love because adding new tests takes time, especially for complicated stuff like oauth flows.<p>Your product <i>should</i> allow our &quot;Product guys&quot; and QA guy write the smoke tests in much less time and maintain them without having to write code or take up developer time, which is huge in a team of 2 guys who write front-end code and would be maintaining the tests.<p>The only real issues I have right now are 1. Errors can be hard to track down since there isn&#x27;t any console output. That&#x27;s something I miss from SauceLabs which was a huge help. 2. Smaller, but annoying, pasting isn&#x27;t allowed when creating a test. This is painful for username&#x2F;password entry. It would also be nice to use some kind of variable to ease this. 3. I&#x27;m unsure of pricing. When I&#x27;m logged in, I see that I have the free plan, but I see no limits or details about the plan.<p>Other than that, it was a great feeling to get a basic smoke test, plus jenkins integration, plus flowdock integration within an hour of discovering the app. Again, great job!
评论 #7648967 未加载
mef大约 11 年前
Pretty cool. Signed up and figured out how to start using it right away, which is in and of itself a great thing.<p>Questions:<p>1. When creating a trace, how do you specify when you&#x27;re finished?<p>2. Is there a way to set a single trace to run on all browsers?<p>3. How do you specify what constitutes a &quot;success&quot; vs. a &quot;fail&quot; for any given trace?
评论 #7648316 未加载
pionar大约 11 年前
I really like the Visual Studio &quot;load testing&quot; [1] for this purpose. My team uses it. It doesn&#x27;t just include a trace of paths through the application, it performs important load testing and analysis. Well worth the price.<p>[1] <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms182594.aspx" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;msdn.microsoft.com&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;library&#x2F;ms182594.aspx</a>
joncalhoun大约 11 年前
How different is this from <a href="https://www.rainforestqa.com/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rainforestqa.com&#x2F;</a> ?<p>I haven&#x27;t used either extensively, but they look similar in a few ways, yet different. I am curious if anyone with knowledge of the two could elaborate on the differences.
评论 #7648100 未加载
评论 #7648161 未加载
lazyant大约 11 年前
Very nice, dashboard and test working as expected, intuitive etc. Only comment is that from the front page I wasn&#x27;t sure what I was signing up for (saw no demo)
评论 #7648179 未加载
评论 #7648059 未加载
rpedela大约 11 年前
On Ubuntu 12.04 with latest Firefox, clicking signup locks up Firefox and subsequently locks up the system. Eventually I am able to launch a terminal and kill the Firefox process. Using latest Chrome, everything works fine.
wehadfun大约 11 年前
How much time does it take to set this up? I ask because it would be nice to set up the test for free then start paying the $90-$700 to actually run unless this is something that a busy engineer can set up in a few hours.
评论 #7648952 未加载
jprince大约 11 年前
Why wouldn&#x27;t you just use Cucumber or RSPEC+Selenium(or some other variant library for a different language) to do it?
评论 #7648895 未加载
评论 #7648823 未加载
SimpleXYZ大约 11 年前
You really need to work on your sign-up form validation. At least add client side validation.
评论 #7661392 未加载