TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google Cloud DNS

158 点作者 valhallarecords大约 11 年前

17 条评论

tedivm大约 11 年前
I&#x27;m wondering how Dyn is taking this. These guys have been working on DNS for years, and were probably one of the first &quot;managed DNS&quot; or &quot;enterprise DNS&quot; services. Over time though they&#x27;ve failed to really innovate, or even keep up with standard (you can&#x27;t use any of their value add services like the global traffic manager if you also want to use DNSSEC, for instance). Despite this their prices have remained ridiculously high. Now that other players are moving into the market at literally multiple orders of magnitude cheaper it&#x27;s tough to see why any of their customers would stay.<p>As a personal note, I would recommend the Edgecast DNS service over anything else. They have amazing customer support (something Google really lacks), and they&#x27;ve been in the CDN game for long enough to know that they are going to be around for awhile. They&#x27;re also rather crazy about getting the best performance possible.
评论 #7664625 未加载
评论 #7664912 未加载
评论 #7666160 未加载
评论 #7665723 未加载
ctz大约 11 年前
&quot;403. That’s an error.<p>Your client does not have permission to get URL &#x2F;cloud-dns&#x2F; from this server. (Client IP address: [my-ipv6-addr])<p>We&#x27;re sorry, but this service is not available in your country.&quot;<p>Google is denying access to services based on their broken ipv6 geolocation data (they think I am in Tehran, but I&#x27;m in London.)
评论 #7667356 未加载
geekam大约 11 年前
Naïve question but what kind of organizations will benefit the most from this service? Or put it other way, the situations this service is needed for? Can anyone explain to me please?
评论 #7664614 未加载
评论 #7666072 未加载
评论 #7665151 未加载
评论 #7664613 未加载
MBlume大约 11 年前
Was this announced by Google today, or is this on HN because of the XKCD? If the former, did Google push the announcement because of the XKCD?
评论 #7664820 未加载
评论 #7664691 未加载
评论 #7665714 未加载
评论 #7664659 未加载
评论 #7668099 未加载
评论 #7664627 未加载
jread大约 11 年前
It&#x27;s a start - barebones authoritative DNS only - no monitoring&#x2F;failover, load balancing, Geo, LBR, etc - provisioning via API only. Route 53 started out this way, and has since added many of these features and now has almost 7% Alexa 10k marketshare and rapidly growing.<p>I created a browser test that measures recursive DNS query times. You can test Google DNS query performance using this link: <a href="http://bit.ly/1nY4e60" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;bit.ly&#x2F;1nY4e60</a>
评论 #7665699 未加载
评论 #7666023 未加载
评论 #7665019 未加载
gibybo大约 11 年前
Their example for a &#x27;high traffic&#x27; site struck me by surprise. With all the caching that goes on with DNS queries, 1.2B in a month seems incredibly high. I wouldn&#x27;t have even imagined google.com getting that many requests to the authoritative name servers. Can someone with a better idea of how traffic corresponds to DNS queries give me some perspective? How many DNS queries are the name servers for a typical Alex top 10 domain getting?
评论 #7665373 未加载
rdl大约 11 年前
I wish either AWS Route 53 or Google Cloud DNS would support being a BIND protocol secondary :(
评论 #7665191 未加载
评论 #7665138 未加载
nodesocket大约 11 年前
DNS is so cheap, and Amazon Route53 has such an advantage with their latency based routing, health checks, and integrations with other AWS services. Honestly zones are $0.50 and $0.50 per million queries. You have to be pushing lots of DNS queries to have costs even exceed a tiny bill of $20 a month.<p>It is the definition of a lot of engineers hours and infrastructure costs for literally no profit for the company. However, it is a basic service every hosting provides has to offer to be competitive.
评论 #7664594 未加载
评论 #7664606 未加载
opendais大约 11 年前
Very nice...let us just hope they add Geo and&#x2F;or Latency based routing. ;)
评论 #7664519 未加载
ksec大约 11 年前
There is no point comparing this to AWS Route53. Purely in terms of speed Cloud DNS win Hands Down. I am not sure if the Cloud DNS is the same as their own DNS infrastructure, if so it is pretty damn fast.<p>The only other two DNS services I recommend is DNSMadeEasy and EdgeCast DNS. Both happens to one of the most affordable as well as fastest. ( Strange combination )<p>The only bad thing is EdgeCast got brought by Verizon. I am worry if anything bad will happen.
评论 #7672445 未加载
gggggggg大约 11 年前
They really need a free bracket. For example, anything under $1 a month.<p>From my perspective, I would prefer to pay $20 a year, than $1 a month.
mrsaint大约 11 年前
I added a quick guide how to setup Cloud DNS for your domain.<p><a href="https://www.zeitgeist.se/2014/05/01/google-cloud-dns-step-by-step/" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.zeitgeist.se&#x2F;2014&#x2F;05&#x2F;01&#x2F;google-cloud-dns-step-by...</a>
jstalin大约 11 年前
I&#x27;d be interested in seeing a speed comparison with Cloudflare. Cloudflare&#x27;s DNS is completely free and it&#x27;s the fastest DNS service I&#x27;m aware of.
评论 #7666966 未加载
known大约 11 年前
<a href="http://wiki.opennicproject.org/ClosestT2Servers" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.opennicproject.org&#x2F;ClosestT2Servers</a>
jonah大约 11 年前
Nice pricing.<p>I&#x27;ve been using UltraDNS for many years but this looks good too.
评论 #7672450 未加载
kenrick95大约 11 年前
They are moving towards <a href="http://xkcd.com/1361/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;xkcd.com&#x2F;1361&#x2F;</a> :P
评论 #7665678 未加载
benguild大约 11 年前
Is this free?
评论 #7664608 未加载
评论 #7664616 未加载