TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why Did Quora Join Y Combinator?

44 点作者 code_devil大约 11 年前

14 条评论

Touche大约 11 年前
Since PG has criticized Quora for it&#x27;s registration wall tactics[1] does this mean they&#x27;re going to turn into a good net citizen?<p>[1]<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5217449" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=5217449</a>
评论 #7730214 未加载
评论 #7730022 未加载
评论 #7730323 未加载
ForHackernews大约 11 年前
&quot;Y Combinator’s growth scientists...&quot;<p>Seriously? Can we stop fucking calling people who do things that aren&#x27;t actually science &quot;scientists&quot;?
评论 #7729957 未加载
评论 #7730330 未加载
评论 #7730173 未加载
评论 #7730076 未加载
spamizbad大约 11 年前
Quora is valued at $900M? Wouldn&#x27;t that mean its worth more than the stackexchange network? I&#x27;m not sure I understand the rationale behind that.
评论 #7730160 未加载
评论 #7729954 未加载
diggan大约 11 年前
That Quora (or any company for that fact) wants to join YC is pretty obvious. For me, the non-obvious thing is why YC would like anything to do with Quora. Maybe I&#x27;m missing something but with the bad things going on at Quora, I can&#x27;t see what&#x27;s in it for YC. Sure, a high-profile company that you now have a small piece in but I didn&#x27;t think YC would go for companies with a reputation already. I thought YC was for helping companies starting up and gaining reputation. I don&#x27;t really believe &quot;Altman wants a piece of every billion dollar company&quot;.
评论 #7729981 未加载
nate_martin大约 11 年前
While I do understand the reasons for Quora wanting to join YC, I can&#x27;t help but feel bad for the one company who will not get to participate now because of this. Maybe I don&#x27;t understand YC well enough to make this claim but it seems like choosing a less established company would be better for both the company and the partners.
评论 #7730312 未加载
评论 #7730331 未加载
Siecje大约 11 年前
One of Quora&#x27;s problems is requiring users to sign up before they can evaluate the quality.
webwielder大约 11 年前
I know it&#x27;s cliche to say, but my god, where did the $141 million go?
评论 #7729966 未加载
评论 #7729956 未加载
评论 #7730248 未加载
guyinblackshirt大约 11 年前
Adam D&#x27;Angelo responded to this question himself:<p><a href="http://www.quora.com/Quora-company/Why-did-Quora-join-the-2014-Y-Combinator-batch/answer/Adam-DAngelo?srid=hDKh&amp;share=1" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quora.com&#x2F;Quora-company&#x2F;Why-did-Quora-join-the-20...</a><p>quote:<p>There are a bunch of reasons why it&#x27;s valuable for Quora to be a YC company: We&#x27;ll have Sam and all the other partners to help us. We get to be part of the YC community &#x2F; alumni network of founders. We get access to all the resources of YC.<p>We were raising money anyway, so there was no overhead in letting YC participate - this ends up the same for us as if we had just raised slightly more money from Tiger. And independent of the benefits to Quora, I think it will be fun personally to participate in some of the YC events. I hope my perspective can help some of the other companies.
amirmc大约 11 年前
I found the following interesting:<p><i>&quot; ... but a source tells us “Altman wants a piece of every billion dollar company, every unicorn.” &quot;</i><p>Just thinking aloud here so bear with me. In time, no-one will remember how much of the company YC took. Just that YC was an investor. If this plays out, then YC gains access to the people that <i>built</i> those companies and has them taking part in the sessions where others are just starting out. In other words, this kind of play might just be a long term investment.<p>Overall, if there&#x27;s a company that gets very successful <i>outside</i> the YC umbrella, this is a way to bring them into the fold (assuming the founders can be persuaded to give up the time).
Theodores大约 11 年前
The question is &#x27;why did Y Combinator allow Quora to join&#x27;.<p>The article points out the obvious problems with Quora. However, what I don&#x27;t understand with some of these large VC backed web efforts that do not make money, is, why don&#x27;t they try the obvious &#x27;run a few adverts&#x27; business model in selected regions.<p>They could run adverts on Quora for those folk in Australia (where advertising is generally as predominant as the U.S.) and see how many people click through the ads or ignore the site because they cannot stand the adverts. It is not rocket science.<p>But, instead of trying to earn some actual money, they stay on the speculative bubble. It is as if they are putting off the inevitable. If the BBC can run ads for international viewers but not licence fee paying Brits, then why cannot the likes of Quora, Pinterest or any of these other web behemoths do something similar, just run a few ads outside the home market? If it doesn&#x27;t work then they can take the adverts off. It is something that can be experimented with, it is not like it would a one time &#x27;lose virginity&#x27; thing that cannot be undone.<p>I personally find Quora to lack some authenticity. It is like those cults that have all the religious symbols, rituals and names yet you know they are not &#x27;real&#x27;. (I know &#x27;real&#x27; religions are fake, but the fakery is not immediately evident, their traditions have evolved rather than been adopted). With Stack Overflow, no matter how poor a question is, you know there is someone that <i>needs</i> that answer (or at least needed it once). With Quora you feel people don&#x27;t ask questions &#x27;as if their life depended on it&#x27; and there is no altruistic reason to answer anything. If you are to answer to &#x27;puff up your profile&#x27; (as per getting points on SO or even here), then, is there any feeling that those &#x27;points&#x27; are worth anything? Who cares!!!<p>I don&#x27;t feel Quora have built up a body of knowledge that is worth anything. If they closed tomorrow then nobody would be stuck in their job, or left unable to do research or feel that some library had been burnt to the ground.<p>Looking at how Wikipedia is funded - essentially a charity with no capitalist-entity overheads like marketing - looks to me like it is extremely clever and shrewd.
评论 #7730184 未加载
d0m大约 11 年前
Dunno, it seems like people are over-thinking it. Adam is definitely a great addition to the alumni and if he believes he can get enough value of YC, why not?
hadoukenio大约 11 年前
Ironically not asked <i>on</i> Quora.
评论 #7729906 未加载
omarforgotpwd大约 11 年前
because they&#x27;re not cool anymore
michaelochurch大约 11 年前
People are trashing Quora because they don&#x27;t understand the source of its value: its data. Facebook has connections that are mostly of low meaning. Twitter has a few pithy 140-character comments and the success thereof on its own social graph. Quora has thoughtfully-written answers to interesting questions, and counts some of the most interesting and intelligent people among its users (and that will improve as it grows). If you are, say, trying to find a quality co-founder or high-level employee, what Quora has to offer is much more valuable.<p>On the surface, Y Combinator gains a lot more than Quora. Y Combinator gains some really strong people in the Summer 2014 session. The average Quora engineer is probably as strong as, or stronger than, the average YC founder. Quora gains an HR liability, because once a firm joins YC, every employee is going to want the social access implicit in being part of YC. That&#x27;s scalable at 4 or 6 people, but not at 77. I&#x27;m sure this has been worked out and special-cased, but I think that the Summer 2014 is going to revolve around Quora, the latter having at least a couple dozen people demanding the YC access.<p>So, here&#x27;s my theory, and it&#x27;s just speculation because I don&#x27;t have inside knowledge. If you have a Quora login, you can read a more extensive analysis here: <a href="http://www.quora.com/Quora-company/Why-did-Quora-join-the-2014-Y-Combinator-batch/answer/Michael-O-Church" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.quora.com&#x2F;Quora-company&#x2F;Why-did-Quora-join-the-20...</a><p>Essentially, Quora has a wealth of natural language data written by some of the most intelligent people in at least one industry. Given that talent searching&#x2F;recruiting is a billion-dollar problem (acqui-hires prove that <i>mediocre</i> talent is worth millions per head; imagine what verified stuff, backed by state-of-the-art NLP rather than executive hunches, is worth) this is pure gold. In fact, it&#x27;s bilaterally beneficial. Talent wants to be discovered, and others want to find it, and currently the process is reliant on social networks (mostly, centered in San Francisco and New York) that are far past tapped-out. &quot;Network-based&quot; hiring leads to same few people being highly sought and paid millions while the rest live in obscurity, and it hurts both sides. If someone can make the job&#x2F;co-founder market more efficient, there&#x27;s immense value-add potential there.<p>Quora probably has the data, right now, to solve this problem to a large degree. The issue for Quora is that the data is, relative to the interests of business and people in it, completely unlabeled. Unsupervised learning is hard, yo. It&#x27;s still unclear whether the guy with 382 upvotes on that machine learning question actually knows what he&#x27;s talking about. (He probably does; but how do you know if those 382 people know anything?) After all, LinkedIn endorsements and recommendations have a well-known inverse property (controlling for age and professional experience, the more someone has, the less qualified that person is). Quora&#x27;s best &quot;labels&quot; for its data are internal social proof statistics, and it&#x27;s going to need something of external value if it wants to convince the larger world that its data means something.<p>This is, I would guess, the first stage of a long-term partnership between Quora and Y Combinator. Quora has a wealth of data from all over the world that, properly read, would be of massive use in talent discovery. YC is an improvement on VC, which itself is a 20th-century-style guild system based on reputation and personal relationships <i>but YC has labelled data</i> relevant to very high talent labels, which is of immense value if you&#x27;re Quora (and if I&#x27;m right about Quora&#x27;s long-term monetization&#x2F;value-add strategy, and who knows if that&#x27;s true). Even though only a small percentage of Quora&#x27;s data will become labelled in joining forces with YC, it becomes a semi-supervised problem, which is easier to solve.<p>Why do I think this is a data play (and a brilliant one, at that)? Frankly, the HR headache is such an issue that I can&#x27;t see Quora doing it unless it would lead to a quantum improvement in its ability to execute.
评论 #7730560 未加载
评论 #7730665 未加载