TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Euclid, Schmeuclid

6 点作者 Jebdm将近 16 年前

2 条评论

gyom超过 15 年前
My conclusion was actually that the points M and N must be the same point, which then implies that they also coincide with R.<p>The drawing can be "faked" by sketching the diameters to be a bit off-center, which results in M,N and R not being exactly the same point.<p>No ?
评论 #781389 未加载
RiderOfGiraffes将近 16 年前
I don't see the point of this. It's wrong, if you spend a moment's thought then it's obvious why it's wrong, and it's about as enlightening or entertaining as the usual proof that 0=1.<p>Can anyone explain what they like about this?