TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why would anyone want to live on Soylent?

52 点作者 houseofshards将近 11 年前

27 条评论

sciguy77将近 11 年前
My uncle, who admittedly is pretty weird, used to only eat Costco pasta and peanut butter for 95% of his meals. The other 5% of the time he had lavish dinners with friends and family, and felt free to spend quite a bit. His logic was &quot;I would rather have one amazing meal every now and again instead of a bunch of mediocre meals spread out.&quot; This may or may not be insane to you in terms of philosophy, but the biggest flaw is that he only ate two kinds of food for weeks on end. I imagine Soylent would be perfect for people like this: on a limited budget they can enjoy the occasional lavish meal without sacrificing nutrition for all their other meals.<p>From the people I know who like the product, it seems to me that Soylent caters to people whose eating patters are already strange. I find it appealing because I tend to obsess over making sure I&#x27;m getting all the right nutrients and food groups (I never am). I like the idea of drinking Soylent every morning as an insurance policy, I know I&#x27;m at least getting all the nutrients I need once a day.
评论 #7803954 未加载
JacobJans将近 11 年前
I&#x27;m someone who loves food. I enjoy cooking wonderful meals. Almost every day I spend twenty to thirty minutes making lunch. It&#x27;s not uncommon for me to spend an hour or two making dinner.<p>Generally, I&#x27;m pretty confident that my diet is &quot;healthy.&quot;<p>But, when thinking about Soylent, people seem to be comparing it to perfection.<p>Why not compare it to some other things.<p>For example, would it be healthier to have a burger, fries, and a milkshake from McDonalds, or to drink Soylent?<p>Isn&#x27;t the answer obvious?<p>Even as someone that regularly eats healthy meals, I still occasionally find it hard to have a healthy meal.<p>Whether or not Soylent should be a complete replacement for food, it&#x27;s probably a great replacement for so much of the garbage junk food that many people eat very, very, regularly.<p>Maybe someday Soylent will put fast food out of business. The benefits would be obvious.
评论 #7804006 未加载
评论 #7803344 未加载
muhuk将近 11 年前
From the article:<p><pre><code> Rhinehart is well aware of the fact that Soylent isn’t the first beverage designed to replace meals. He considered using Ensure for his initial no-eating experiment, but found it much too expensive, too sugary, too unpalatable, and sub-optimal in its ingredient make-up. The differentiating factor seems to be in the intended purpose. Meal-replacement shakes have never been presented as a food — something that you could (or might want to) live on for an extended period.</code></pre>
评论 #7802835 未加载
评论 #7802994 未加载
gexla将近 11 年前
The poor hacker&#x27;s desk delivered lunch. There&#x27;s so much overhead which goes into putting meals together. Just having to make ONE more decision is a day can totally derail me. That decision could be &quot;what&#x27;s for breakfast?&quot;<p>Personally, I would rather drink from a bag all day and then throw a fiesta for dinner to make up for bag time.
rdmcfee将近 11 年前
This was touched on in the article but I still feel it&#x27;s necessary to point out that nutrition is one of the least understood fields in science.<p>The primary reason is that there are almost zero proper clinical trials and interventional studies. We have thousands of cohort studies which prove almost nothing.<p>For example, for 60 years saturated fat has been considered the enemy of cardiovascular health (because of some poorly conducted cohort studies in the 60&#x27;s and 70&#x27;s). Just this March, BMJ published a major meta study that showing that there are no proven causal links between saturated fat and heart disease. In fact it is now being suggested that avoiding saturated fat has been detrimental because Americans have replaced fat intake with high glycemic index foods causing obesity and T2D.<p>Personally I have no doubt that Soylent will fail to provide some required nutrient or fail to induce a certain hormonal or chemical response which is obtained via natural food intake. We simply don&#x27;t understand nutrition well enough to check all the boxes. That said, if Soylent wanted to follow the scientific method and conduct a proper interventional clinical trial with a control group, adequate study population and duration I would be happy to consider the results.
评论 #7803970 未加载
argumentum将近 11 年前
I&#x27;ve been enjoying my first week of Soylent. I eat &quot;regular&quot; dinner, but the rest of the day I drink a cup of soylent every couple hours. The best part about Soylent is it&#x27;s hackable. I&#x27;m looking to gain weight, so I use whole milk instead of water, and add 4 eggs and 1&#x2F;4 cup heavy whipping cream which also dramatically improves the taste (for me at least).<p>It&#x27;s almost like drinking melted ice cream, to be honest.
评论 #7802909 未加载
评论 #7802911 未加载
jqm将近 11 年前
Why &quot;live on it&quot;?<p>I don&#x27;t live on exclusively on anything else. It&#x27;s a cool idea and I hope it replaces &quot;some&quot; meals because occasionally I just don&#x27;t have the time and it has to be better (and more convenient) than fast food. Why do we have to take good things to extremes and set up unnecessary &quot;all or nothings&quot;?
评论 #7802969 未加载
gibybo将近 11 年前
Using the oil packets and purchasing the most cost effective plan (28 bags for 255&#x2F;month), Soylent gives you 220 calories per dollar. For a relatively sedentary averaged sized adult male (2100 calories&#x2F;day), it will cost you about $285&#x2F;month.<p>Ensure powder from Amazon[0] gets you to about 205 calories per dollar, which comes to $305&#x2F;month for the same adult male. I don&#x27;t buy the &#x27;it&#x27;s a lot cheaper than Ensure&#x27; line.<p>Another competitor, &quot;Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass&quot; is on Amazon in 12 pound bags for $49. It works out to 408 calories per dollar. Only $154&#x2F;month for the same example male.<p>Admittedly Ensure and Serious Mass have different marketing than Soylent (Ensure for old people and Serious Mass for bodybuilders), but if you compare their ingredients you&#x27;ll find they aren&#x27;t very different.<p>[0] <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Ensure-Nutrition-Powder-Vanilla-Flavor/dp/B0007XXPLQ" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Ensure-Nutrition-Powder-Vanilla-Flavor...</a> [1] <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Optimum-Nutrition-Serious-Chocolate-Pound/dp/B000GIPJ0M" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.amazon.com&#x2F;Optimum-Nutrition-Serious-Chocolate-Po...</a>
papa_bear将近 11 年前
I think it could find a big market in people who care A LOT about eating specific nutrient proportions.<p>I&#x27;m working on the website Eat This Much (<a href="http://www.eatthismuch.com" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eatthismuch.com</a>) and a huge portion of our audience are people that want to eat EXACTLY 40% of their calories from carbs, 30% from fat, and 30% from protein (that&#x27;s part of the zone diet, as an example). Our meal plan generator allows you to request those proportions, but sometimes it can&#x27;t meet the exact targets due to any number of other constraints, and it&#x27;s a huge source of complaints from our users. It&#x27;s a pretty complicated problem to solve while trying to give people a varied and interesting diet with real food, but Soylent makes it very simple. I use my own site as much as possible, and I&#x27;m excited to have it give me half of my calories from Soylent (probably my breakfast and lunch).
Zigurd将近 11 年前
It&#x27;s possible that living on Soylent is healthier than the way the majority of people eat, maybe a large majority.
codezero将近 11 年前
I&#x27;m not sure people will want to live on Soylent, at least the first batch seems to be targeted at people who are intrigued by the idea and want to experiment with it. If that experiment pans out, then maybe there will be a question about why people want to live on it.
corysama将近 11 年前
The explicitly stated purpose of Soylent is NOT to live on. NOT to &quot;End Food&quot;. It is to be a better <i>occasional</i> meal replacement. It&#x27;s a nice improvement on many boring products that preceded it (Ensure, etc). But, that doesn&#x27;t make for good linkbait headlines nor revenue-generating eyeballs on sidewall ads. This is yet another in a long series of manufactured-controversy articles propping up Soylent as either the Savior or the Devil. YOU DECIDE!<p>Not that I mind. I&#x27;m a backer of Soylent. When my month&#x27;s supply arrives, I&#x27;m looking forward to living on it 100% for 30 days for a few reasons:<p>1) I need to lose a bit of weight. I know that for me, the best way to do that is to significantly change my &quot;generally good but occasionally indulgent&quot; diet. I know from experience that I can&#x27;t willpower that into happening. But, I think that if I commit to a defined, strict diet, I stand a chance. Soylent should be particularly good for that because supposedly it won&#x27;t leave me with carb&#x2F;protein&#x2F;fat cravings like every other diet I&#x27;ve tried.<p>2) I like the idea of going on a cleanse. What better cleanse than supposedly exactly what your body needs and nothing else?<p>3) I&#x27;m interested in the chemical science vs. mystical vitalism theory of nutrition debate. I.e. do we need certain chemicals or do we need &quot;<i>something</i> to do with <i>Real Food</i>&quot; to thrive? Supposedly, people feel really fine living on Soylent. I want to see for myself first-hand. I plan to get my &quot;blood work&quot; numbers measured before and after.
评论 #7803505 未加载
评论 #7803150 未加载
评论 #7803033 未加载
评论 #7803053 未加载
jeswin将近 11 年前
&gt; The big-picture implications are also interesting. Rob Rhinehart definitely has grand ambitions for this product and hopes it will play a role in alleviating hunger.<p>Well, this is the part that excites me a lot. Industrial scale production and distribution of a nutritionally sufficient meal could do wonders in the developing world. As of now, even though there are food subsidies for the poor, there are additional expenses (gas, stoves) and wastage involved. And the saved time could be put to work.<p>A different incarnation of solyent could change the world.<p>Last time I said this [<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7765697" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=7765697</a>], I was surprised I got downvoted into oblivion. I was genuinely curious why this isn&#x27;t a good idea to take up at the governmental level.
评论 #7803102 未加载
cperciva将近 11 年前
I&#x27;m seriously considering it, at least as an experiment. I have type 1 diabetes, so I&#x27;m constantly trying to figure out how much insulin to take -- and I don&#x27;t always get it right. This is <i>mostly</i> a matter of judging the food I&#x27;m consuming, but not completely; there&#x27;s also endocrine issues which affect blood glucose levels (usually pushing them up), and exercise usually pulls blood glucose levels down.<p>I think having a &quot;standard diet&quot; which takes food out of the picture would make it much easier to figure out how all the other pieces fit together.
评论 #7803001 未加载
ThatGeoGuy将近 11 年前
People keep going on and on about the nutritional value of the drink overall, but I&#x27;m somewhat curious to the effects it might have on the digestive tract.<p>For example, if you ate soylent for a full year, and then went straight back to regular food, would your body have trouble digesting solid food now that it hasn&#x27;t had to do so for a long period of time? What if we extend this time period to 5 years, or 10? I think we can maybe pull some insight from astronauts in this regard, as we should have some information about the change from tube-food to solid food from extended space missions.<p>I can see soylent being a fantastic replacement in some respects, particularly with regards to coeliac&#x27;s disease or with dairy allergies, but I&#x27;m still partially skeptical about the kinds of change that soylent will introduce in the future. One of the great parts about food nowadays is that you can basically grow and manufacture it anywhere, with the obvious caveat that not all food is available everywhere at once. On the other hand, with soylent, our food is almost &quot;centralized&quot; in a sense, since it is likely more difficult to create soylent than it is to throw seeds in the ground, or hunt and scavenge. This is sort of the reason why I&#x27;m curious to how the human body will react to such an abrupt change in diet. If humans just eat liquid food for an extended period of time, or their whole life, will they eventually lose &#x2F; have difficulties with eating solid, more traditional food? Should a crisis arise (something akin to great floods or an earthquake), will it be possible to produce &#x2F; ship enough soylent fast enough to fulfill the dietary needs of the population in need of aid?<p>Of course, these sorts of questions assume that soylent will become a dietary replacement, rather than an occasional meal replacement, but I get the feeling, at least from this article, that replacing the diet is the plan of Rhinehart et al. I won&#x27;t personally test soylent out, I love fancy food and flavours too much to bother, but in some sense I will follow the product and see what happens with it. I don&#x27;t think something on this scale has ever been attempted before with regards to dietary &#x2F; meal replacements, so it should be interesting (not necessarily good or bad, just interesting) to see what kinds of disasters &#x2F; utopias unfold thanks to a full dietary replacement.
leorocky将近 11 年前
Maybe &quot;soylent profitable&quot; is the new &quot;ramen profitable&quot; or whatever.
meisterbrendan将近 11 年前
Can folks in the Bay Area pick up Soylent sooner than the 10-12 weeks it takes to ship to new customers? I&#x27;d totally be willing to drive to pick up a shipment--I want to try this life hack out NOW (or as close to now as possible).
评论 #7803139 未加载
DanBC将近 11 年前
So many people are saying &quot;i don&#x27;t want to think&quot; - Indians need to expand &quot;tiffin&quot; to the US. Make it nutritious and you&#x27;d make a freaking fortune.
phazmatis将近 11 年前
Soylent is a huge first step. Henceforth, we&#x27;ll know &quot;what we don&#x27;t know&quot; about specific humans, and what is a general baseline throughout. That&#x27;ll help us (humanity) make directed efforts to automate soylent mixture tweaking. I really can&#x27;t wait for a device that scans me before each meal and decides what I need. Nutritionists would be in high demand, because who&#x27;s going to trust a machine? At least for N years until entire generations have been through this system.
patrickdavey将近 11 年前
I assume if you subsist on a diet of liquids alone that your teeth get upset due to complete underuse.<p>Anyone know if that&#x27;s true?
评论 #7802885 未加载
评论 #7802883 未加载
Thiz将近 11 年前
Soylent bars sound like a cool idea. No dishes to do, no groceries to shop, no time spent in the kitchen.<p>Pure gain.
benguild将近 11 年前
It seems like a great solution to the “forgetting to eat” issue while hackathoning.
tiatia将近 11 年前
Would be perfect for me. Never heard about it. I have a nasty food intolerance (rare from of gluten intolerance) that I was not aware off and made my life miserable. Unconscionably I realized that eating is not good for me when I worked as a scientist and had a heavy workload. Hence I lived on coffee, skipping breakfast, skipping lunch and ate my first meal around 5 or 6pm. One day my feeling for hunger was gone. First you form habits, then they form you I guess.<p>Other people eat because they are hungry. I eat because I know I have to sustain my body. It is often hard for me or even annoying to eat food and I have difficulties getting my calories every day. Yes, I would buy this drink.
mantrax5将近 11 年前
Just because the ad says you&#x27;ll want to live on Soylent, doesn&#x27;t mean you would.<p>There&#x27;s a certain kind of people who like to buy into simple formulas for health, success and so on. There are more of them than it&#x27;s comfortable to admit.<p>The ad is worded to appeal to them, because after all Soylent is a business, and which business would ignore the large segment of the market that&#x27;ll be buying your product regularly, <i>every single day</i>?<p>For those who are more balanced thinkers, Soylent remains an interesting option when you need to have a meal on the go. Better than fast food.<p>A side reminded, just like with vitamin pills, you should be skeptical of some of the claims made about Soylent&#x27;s ingredients. Say, just because a product has calcium in <i>some form</i> doesn&#x27;t mean your body can assimilate it in that form.
nether将近 11 年前
Another &quot;stop liking what I don&#x27;t like&quot; view. You could make similar arguments against fast food and other products of convenience.
评论 #7802960 未加载
chemmail将近 11 年前
All this really is, is ground up rice, a vitamin pill, and some oil. No Thanks.
yaketysax将近 11 年前
1. There are a lot of (nonessential) nutrients that you get from plants that you won&#x27;t get from this drink.<p>2. Our idea of &quot;everything the body needs&quot; can change.<p>3. We don&#x27;t know the long term effects of relying solely on it.<p>The author spends a lot of time on stupid counterarguments. Seriously, do your homework.
评论 #7802919 未加载