TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: What's your least favorite tech word? Mine's "non-trivial".

5 点作者 ncarlson超过 15 年前
Any time I hear someone mutter "non-trivial" a little piece of me dies inside. What other art/profession uses that word?<p>I can't imagine an automotive engineer describing a new car engine as non-trivial or a painter describing his work as non-trivial.<p>Anyways, what words wind you guys up?<p>Edit: Happy Monday, btw.

22 条评论

gdp超过 15 年前
I have to step in here to defend "non-trivial".<p>Perhaps it is abused as a term by the population at large, but I'm reasonably sure it has its roots in theoretical computer science and maths. It has a meaning that is distinct from "complex". It means that something requires something more than pure mechanical verification or straightforward inspection.<p>A painter could use "non-trivial" in a sensible way. How much effort is involved in X? Well, it's non-trivial, because it involves more than having a look. It isn't estimating the effort, it is instead a binary classification - trivial and non-trivial.<p>Finally, to answer your question, I don't dislike individual words. I only dislike them once they are combined into sentences.
评论 #782174 未加载
评论 #782586 未加载
yan超过 15 年前
Enterprise.
评论 #782443 未加载
jacquesm超过 15 年前
paradigm shift<p>leverage
评论 #782591 未加载
评论 #782619 未加载
gaius超过 15 年前
Idempotent.<p>But non-trivial does have a specific meaning: it means that we don't have any code already written or proven technique that we can simply reuse for or apply to this problem, and some new knowledge will have to be synthesized, and there's a risk in making any estimates of time/cost until more is known.
评论 #782669 未加载
RiderOfGiraffes超过 15 年前
Quantum, in almost any context. I do use non-trivial, but I'm a mathematician, and I refer you to Feynman's comments about tthe use of 'trivial'.
TallGuyShort超过 15 年前
It's not limited to tech people, but I do hear them say it a lot: "irregardless".<p>edit: Oh and let's not forget Scott Adam's favorite: Synergy
评论 #782250 未加载
zackola超过 15 年前
kludge synergy/synergistic/synergize proactive xml
评论 #782210 未加载
bddbbdb超过 15 年前
Tech/business jargon: "leverage" (when used as a verb) anywhere: "utilize" (when used as a word)
jlintz超过 15 年前
"the cloud" please make it go away, it's totally the next buzzword to replace 'web 2.0'
ganley超过 15 年前
There's a joke that when an engineer says 'nontrivial,' he means 'impossible.'
评论 #782603 未加载
moe超过 15 年前
Turnkey Solution<p>(My brain always translates to turkey inducing...)
davidw超过 15 年前
"Trivial" itself can sound quite snotty, said in the right way.
screwLoose超过 15 年前
'webinar' has been annoying me for years now.
Maro超过 15 年前
synergy<p>(Go watch 'In good company')
michaelcampbell超过 15 年前
"Configurable"
odvious超过 15 年前
revolutionary
lamby超过 15 年前
"Realtime"
yagibear超过 15 年前
disambiguate
jsm386超过 15 年前
dead simple
yannis超过 15 年前
Erlang!
tdonia超过 15 年前
savvy
electronslave超过 15 年前
Drill. Like "drill down".<p>It seems that trepanation might be a good response to someone using this word.<p>"Could you drill down into my data set and shift some paradigms?" "Yes, and while I'm at it, I'll equalize your humours." <i>WHIRR</i> "Indeed."