Hmm, the first 10 minutes had my attention, and I was agreeing on his points that design is obviously subjective, and difficult to measure. With code, you can spend a week refactoring a section of your project, and conclude with certainty that it's better written. With design, you try to do the same, and get 60% of people agreeing it's the right direction, and 40% saying you're going the wrong way. This creates a lot of internal conflicts, and noise as you try to reach your goal. I was hoping this talk was going to go into some specifics of how we <i>can</i> measure great design, and how we can clear some of that noise and have more confidence in our decisions.<p>However, it seemed like the talk stopped after the intro, then it spent 30 minutes showcasing some odds and ends from his past work.