So how are "page ranking, search results, and cached data" inherently evil? These are some of the basic services that make the web as we know it work. Also, energy consumption? My understanding is that they were doing quite a lot to meet their needs with renewable sources[1][2]. I hardly think that qualifies as evil.<p>Sure, there are times and issues we can point to where Google has failed their motto. You could make an argument that their mission to "organize the world's information" <i>is</i> evil when it is carried to it's logical extreme, or at least empowers evil. But this comic is not making those points. It's just grabbing a bunch of old headlines, some of which aren't even relevant.<p>Though I confess I never really "got" Doonesbury. It's rarely accurate enough to pass as a political cartoon and rarely funny enough for the funny pages.<p>[1]: <a href="http://www.google.com/green/energy/" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/green/energy/</a><p>[2]: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/07/20/us-google-windpower-idUSTRE66J3BL20100720" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/07/20/us-google-windpowe...</a>