I did (some of) this with chicagocrime.org in 2005... :-)<p>...and I've since learned the error of my ways. It's just too misleading to do these types of overly simplistic data reports. The data set is flawed in many ways, including:<p>* Data model. The Chicago crime data only has a single date/time field. For many crimes, such as break-ins, the victim/reporter isn't able to pinpoint an exact time; they might just provide a time <i>range</i>. That doesn't jive well with the data model.<p>* Data mistakes. I dealt with public record databases extensively from 2005-2012 (Washington Post, chicagocrime.org, EveryBlock). Government data sets (like any data sets!) contain mistakes, which are compounded when you do aggregate queries.<p>* Systematic police department effort to reduce crime numbers through data trickery. See the amazing recent piece by Chicago Magazine: <a href="http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/June-2014/Chicago-crime-statistics/" rel="nofollow">http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/June-2014/Chicago...</a><p>All in all, obviously this post is harmless link bait at face value, but more thought should be given to these issues. Open govt. data is a good thing, but it's healthy to be skeptical.<p>(Note chicagocrime.org is no longer around, as I redirected it to my other project, EveryBlock, several years ago: <a href="http://www.holovaty.com/writing/chicagocrime.org-tribute/" rel="nofollow">http://www.holovaty.com/writing/chicagocrime.org-tribute/</a>)